<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (His Greatness @ Oct 13 2005, 06:41 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>Dude thats beastGREAT jobi like v2 better tho'Mazin background and appealing textgreat job bro</div> Agreed! AMAAAAAAAZING, just like I said on WCX.I just wish you guys had put Santana more on the left side of the wall
Really liking it. Though, I don't think theres a need for the "2 Fast 2 Furious" stuff. Kinda ruins it.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ortiz34 @ Oct 13 2005, 07:08 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>Really liking it. Though, I don't think theres a need for the "2 Fast 2 Furious" stuff. Kinda ruins it.</div> what you mean? He is fast and furious when on the feild, thats a way of describing who he is and it helps build on the theme of the wallpaper In what way does it ruin it? Have you ever watched the way Santana Moss plays?
No, I'm not saying that he isn't. It's just that if it just said 'Santana Moss', that would look sick. No need for extra stuff.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JHair @ Oct 13 2005, 03:35 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ortiz34 @ Oct 13 2005, 07:08 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'> Really liking it. Though, I don't think theres a need for the "2 Fast 2 Furious" stuff. Kinda ruins it.</div>what you mean? He is fast and furious when on the feild, thats a way of describing who he is and it helps build on the theme of the wallpaper In what way does it ruin it? Have you ever watched the way Santana Moss plays? </div> Actually, he is soft as could be on the field. Furious my ass. Any remotely physical cornerback that bumps him at the line and Moss will be a complete non-factor.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ven0m @ Oct 13 2005, 07:10 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JHair @ Oct 13 2005, 03:35 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'> <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ortiz34 @ Oct 13 2005, 07:08 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'> Really liking it. Though, I don't think theres a need for the "2 Fast 2 Furious" stuff. Kinda ruins it.</div>what you mean? He is fast and furious when on the feild, thats a way of describing who he is and it helps build on the theme of the wallpaper In what way does it ruin it? Have you ever watched the way Santana Moss plays? </div>Actually, he is soft as could be on the field. Furious my ass. Any remotely physical cornerback that bumps him at the line and Moss will be a complete non-factor. </div> mad because Moss isnt on the Jets anymore
Correct. Moss > ColesWe got the better end of the deal.fu∑ri∑ous (fyr-s)adj. Full of activity; energetic or rapid: the furious pace of the trading floor.HOW ABOUT THE FURIOUS PACE OF SANTANA MOSS? SOFT ISN'T THE SAME AS FURIOUS
Moss is the same as Coles IMO Coles is better blocking wise. But sometimes Coles makes some careless mistakes IMO like dropping the ball in big situations.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (His Greatness @ Oct 13 2005, 09:21 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>Moss is the same as Coles IMO Coles is better blocking wise. But sometimes Coles makes some careless mistakes IMO like dropping the ball in big situations.</div>Can Coles return punts like Moss can? No.He isn't as well rounded as Moss is. Yes, he is a bigger guy than him, they have completely different bodys but compare the 2 so far this season.http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/235234http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/187742yes yes I know Jets have had QB problems, but Mark Brunell is not an allstarRedskins have made more out of the trade than have the Jets thus far, thats why I feel Moss > ColesYou can't say they are the same. Which one WOULD YOU RATHER HAVE ON YOUR TEAM? Thats the better guy right there.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JHair @ Oct 13 2005, 08:37 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (His Greatness @ Oct 13 2005, 09:21 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'> Moss is the same as Coles IMO Coles is better blocking wise. But sometimes Coles makes some careless mistakes IMO like dropping the ball in big situations.</div>Can Coles return punts like Moss can? No.He isn't as well rounded as Moss is. Yes, he is a bigger guy than him, they have completely different bodys but compare the 2 so far this season.http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/235234http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/187742yes yes I know Jets have had QB problems, but Mark Brunell is not an allstarRedskins have made more out of the trade than have the Jets thus far, thats why I feel Moss > ColesYou can't say they are the same. Which one WOULD YOU RATHER HAVE ON YOUR TEAM? Thats the better guy right there. </div> Well look at Brunells performance this year, playing like he IS an allstar
True he hasn't made many mistakes, and who am I kidding, hes like my favorite QB, but lets be honest with ourselves, he's not going to the probowl and he is past his prime
You gotta be kidding me with this.He is nicknamed Sideline Santana for a reason. You are talking about a player who OPENLY ADMITTED running to the sidelines to avoid getting hit instead of trying to get some extra yards. You are talking about a player who has suffered from a major case of Hamstring injuries his entire career and when he is playing hurt he is useless. Thats why he is Sideline Santana, because his injured ass is sitting on the sidelines or he is running towards the sidelines. He is about as soft as it gets and will never be a true #1 Wide Reciever in the NFL.Laveranues Coles on the other hand has something that Santana Moss will never have, heart. He plays the game like it is meant to be played, where he will give you 120% on every down. He is one of the best blocking WR's in the game, he is one of the fastest players in the game and he has good hands(although he has dropped a few lame duck passes from Pennington and Bollinger this season). His stats are down because he has had to deal with having the Quarterback Carousel in New York and yet he had his best game yet last week, when a Quarterback who wasnt injured and didnt suck finally was in there. He put up roughly 90 yards against one hell of a Tampa Bay defense.Who would I rather have on my team? I dont care what the stats say, but I want the better player and for that, The Answer is Easy, Laveranues Coles.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ven0m @ Oct 13 2005, 10:10 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>You gotta be kidding me with this.He is nicknamed Sideline Santana for a reason. You are talking about a player who OPENLY ADMITTED running to the sidelines to avoid getting hit instead of trying to get some extra yards. You are talking about a player who has suffered from a major case of Hamstring injuries his entire career and when he is playing hurt he is useless. Thats why he is Sideline Santana, because his injured ass is sitting on the sidelines or he is running towards the sidelines. He is about as soft as it gets and will never be a true #1 Wide Reciever in the NFL.Laveranues Coles on the other hand has something that Santana Moss will never have, heart. He plays the game like it is meant to be played, where he will give you 120% on every down. He is one of the best blocking WR's in the game, he is one of the fastest players in the game and he has good hands(although he has dropped a few lame duck passes from Pennington and Bollinger this season). His stats are down because he has had to deal with having the Quarterback Carousel in New York and yet he had his best game yet last week, when a Quarterback who wasnt injured and didnt suck finally was in there. He put up roughly 90 yards against one hell of a Tampa Bay defense.Who would I rather have on my team? I dont care what the stats say, but I want the better player and for that, The Answer is Easy, Laveranues Coles.</div> The OTHER Moss rarely goes into the middle too...
