Politics Please say rock bottom is getting close

Wouldnt amending the constitution to deny their ability to implement their beliefs be enough of a statement saying they are flat out wrong ?

 

No. If someone pushes taking away human rights in healthcare, they deserve ridicule. Amending the constitution doesn't mean they can't try to change it to something sinister.

 

Simply make it illegal for women to refuse the advances of her husband. As the bible says. And every woman must be married if she wants to be a citizen with rights.

Outlawing birth control is already on the way...

Colossians 3:18
Wives, submit to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord.

 

To each their own. I am of the mindset that everyone should be allowed to think and believe what they want without ridicule. Once they act on their beliefs, then its out the window.
Id rather see productive methods to make things better for all. To me ridicule isn't going to change their thinking so its wasted energy and time.
Ill put my energy into making sure they cant make their beliefs a reality over ridicule.

 

What law disagrees?

What analogy?

 

Good luck. They won't change. Ridicule it is.

 

No luck needed. Simply a mindset.

 

If you told me to kill somebody, and you gave me the ability to do so (as the supreme court gave the states the ability to restrict the rights to citizens) and I did it, you would then be charged as well.

 

Please explain how you come to this conclusion?

giving someone the ability is super grey.
If i handed you a gun and told you to kill someone and you did so, the courts would NOT hold me responsible( as long as it was a legal gun and the individual i gave the gun to has no criminal history preventing him from possessing a gun of course).

I know of no law or court that would agree with you.
Another analogy: if i drove you to the fremont bridge told you to jump off and you did so, Am i on the hook for manslaughter?

 

Yes, you could be held responsible in both cases.

You would be an accomplice, in both cases.

 

Perhaps. There have been cases where the girlfriend told the boyfriend to kill himself through texts. She was charged with involuntary manslaughter.

 

https://lawrina.com/blog/accessory-... illegal to encourage,fact or before the fact.

 

I am not sure i agree with that ruling.
Should i ridicule the judges?

 

thanks. Didnt know.
However i disagree with this. This is manipulation of freedom of choice to me. We are all our own entities capable of making our own decisions, regardless of what has influenced us to do so.
With the links definition, it could be said thst some video game manufactures and movie producers should also then be convicted of assisted murder when the product has influenced someone to do what they see on tv or in a game.

 

The law disagrees. No game or movie is at risk of such action, or it would have taken place long ago.

There have been many attempts to hold entertainment accountable for the actions of sick people, but the law protects them.

I understand you disagree, but you're wrong. The law has been very clear on this, with historic precedent, and that is why the Supreme Court is also very wrong.

It had already ruled specifically on abortion, there was precedent protecting the right, which all justices agreed should be respected.

The constitution and the process is not the problem.

The untruthful and extremist justices who are perverting both the Constitution and the Supreme Court are the problem.

https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/accessory-to-a-felony.html