Theme: Vince Young - QB - TexasRecommended Pictures (Not mandatory to use one of these):http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y242/Ven0...vinceyoung2.jpghttp://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y242/Ven0.../vinceyoung.jpgDue Date: April 2nd, 11:59 PMRules:Signature Rules-Each Signature MUST be 500 pixels wide x 150 pixels tall Or Smaller.-Each Signature MUST contain "NFLCentral.net" somewhere on it.-NO PORNOGRAPHY. This will result in Instant Disqualification in the Tournament.-No Animated GIF's.ALL SIGNATURES ARE TO BE PM'ED TO MYSELF AND PLEASE DO NOT POST THEM ON OTHER FORUMS TO KEEP THE ANOMYNOUS PART OF THE CONTEST IN TACT. AFTER THE VOTING IS OVER YOU MAY POST THEM ON OTHER FORUMS
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (kkespn @ Mar 30 2006, 05:28 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>ehh, f*** it, im not gonna waste my time.gj mcm</div>Why not?You have just as good a chance of winning it as he does.PS: I have MCM's sig.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (kkespn @ Mar 30 2006, 05:28 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>ehh, f*** it, im not gonna waste my time.gj mcm</div>that's lame.......why sign up if you're not even going to try?Come on kk, you still got a few days and you're good at graphics, make something and let's do this. My sig is DEFINITELY beatable. It's all for fun anyway. Let's do this bud.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (dygraphics @ Mar 30 2006, 08:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I would love the oppurtunity to take his place if he does not want to continue.Lemme know </div>if i do drop out, i'd rather mcm have a bye or somethin...
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (kkespn @ Apr 2 2006, 04:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>i might submit if i have time tonight.</div>Well I'm getting ready to take off for a late night poker game at a friend's place.......so if ya get something turned in before the deadline, good luck bud.
My pick: AThis was a very hard decision for me. I'm happy kkespn was able to put up a tough challenger. Didn't expect him to perform so well but I like the fact what he had done with his sig. Yeah I can see it's a simple look but it looks pretty sick. I'm diggin the text as well. Like I said, I didn't know who to pick because you both did a very great job.
I wasn't a fan of neither of these sigs, but here's the breakdown:<u>A:</u>I do NOT know what's going on with the background, don't like the bold, thin transition text at all though. Bad manip (right?). <u>B:</u>The BG is alright, but the picture effect is horrible, it's right there in the front so it's the first impression. Don't like the text much at all either, bad font, bad text.Vote:B
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (His Greatness @ Apr 3 2006, 02:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I wasn't a fan of neither of these sigs, but here's the breakdown:<u>A:</u>I do NOT know what's going on with the background, don't like the bold, thin transition text at all though. Bad manip (right?). <u>B:</u>The BG is alright, but the picture effect is horrible, it's right there in the front so it's the first impression. Don't like the text much at all either, bad font, bad text.Vote:B</div>I agree with everything he said. Although A did try a pretty sig photo manipulation, its just too simple looking in the BG and I dont like the text. Maybe next time try adding some well blended grunge brushing to the BG.The pic effect on B is just terrible.......the BG is decent at best. Not your best sig man. Sorry.Very close, but i vote B.
Winner: AIts smoother and cleaner and easier on the eyes to look at. The bg in B is to messy and text in A is nicer.
Bradkaz seems to be MIA so Im gonna have CWebb4 step in and vote in this one....hes a good buddy of mine so take it easy on him.
