<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brooksie5 @ Apr 8 2006, 06:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Liriano is better than "King Felix", Maholm, and Cain. All 3 of them will be good, but Liriano will be better. I out of all the pitchers in the league, he's in the top 10 for nastiest stuff. His pitches have soo much movement, and are all hard, it's sweet.</div>heh, you said hard.....
i am sorry man......but you are one of the biggest homers i have ever seend. Saying he has the top 10 pitches? He has pitched in like 10 major league games. PS. Felix is far and away the best young pitcher in the game.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brooksie5 @ Apr 8 2006, 07:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Liriano is better than "King Felix", Maholm, and Cain. All 3 of them will be good, but Liriano will be better. I out of all the pitchers in the league, he's in the top 10 for nastiest stuff. His pitches have soo much movement, and are all hard, it's sweet.</div>Wow, there is no arguing with that... lol.
He's not one of the top 10 pitchers. Not even close. what I was saying is that his stuff (movement and shit) is top 10 (maybe a lil high). I'll just be quiet cause I won't be able to win this 1 on a billion debate. I still think Liriano is better than Felix.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (bobferg @ Apr 8 2006, 10:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>i am sorry man......but you are one of the biggest homers i have ever seend. Saying he has the top 10 pitches? He has pitched in like 10 major league games. PS. Felix is far and away the best young pitcher in the game.</div>Well the best "Young" pitcher in the game is Dontrelle Willis. But the best inxperienced pitcher in the game is Felix.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (bobferg @ Apr 9 2006, 12:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>oh yea...........willis showed his stuff in the WBC. please. Willis is overratted.</div>Count the wins, count the rings, count the K's....Until Felix proves otherwise, it's Willis.
yea count the wins and rings and K's with willis in his 4th year and felix in his first full year. good point. Marlins (without willis when he was a rookie) > Mariners (without felix)yea count the wins and rings and K's with willis in his 4th year and felix in his first full year. good point. Marlins (without willis when he was a rookie) > Mariners (without felix)
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (bobferg @ Apr 9 2006, 01:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>yea count the wins and rings and K's with willis in his 4th year and felix in his first full year. good point. Marlins (without willis when he was a rookie) > Mariners (without felix)yea count the wins and rings and K's with willis in his 4th year and felix in his first full year. good point. Marlins (without willis when he was a rookie) > Mariners (without felix)</div>You're pretty much proving my point: Until Felix proves he's better, he's not.
