<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Vikings ready to dismiss FoleyPlayer personnel vice president's rocky tenure could end soonKevin Seifert, Star TribuneLast update: May 02, 2006The Vikings were attempting this afternoon to negotiate a contract settlement with personnel director Fran Foley in a move that would end Foley's rocky tenure with the team, according to three NFL sources with knowledge of the situation.The circumstances leading to the decision were not immediately clear, and it was possible Foley could remain with the team if the sides are unable to settle the terms of a three-year contract he signed Jan. 21. Without question, however, the Vikings are seeking to part ways with Foley two days after he presided over the NFL draft and three months after he was hired to be part of owner Zygi Wilf's three-pronged leadership team, along with coach Brad Childress and vice president for football operations Rob Brzezinski.Wilf did not return phone calls. Lester Bagley, vice president of public affairs and stadium development, declined comment on the situation when reached by phone Tuesday afternoon.On April 21, Foley admitted that he had mischaracterized, on four occasions, his early work history on the r�sum� he submitted to the Vikings prior to his interview with team officials in January. Foley also exaggerated the extent of his college playing career at Framingham State College, asserting that he had played four seasons when in fact he had played only two.Foley's logical replacement would be Scott Studwell, director of college scouting. Studwell was passed over for the job Foley eventually received, but is said to be content with his current job.</div>
He's suing us for being wrongly fired. What a tool. Wilf's team of attorneys will own him. Let's see.. who has more money.. the multi millionaire who bought the vikes for 600 mil or the Consultant who probably makes less than 1 mil per year.
<span style="color:#993399">Well, it's going to be the fashionable thing to bash the Vikings on this, but from the sounds of things, Foley was a fucking douchebag and deserved this.</span><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Danger signs about Foley didn't take long to ariseIn three months, many employees were seeing the new hire's overbearing behavior. And word eventually got to Zygi Wilf.Vikings Insider Kevin SeifertLess than 24 hours before the first draft of the Zygi Wilf Era, much of the conversation at Winter Park had nothing to do with players, rankings or trades. No, the topic on April 28 centered squarely on one issue: What to do about Fran Foley, whose tenure as vice president of player personnel was approaching a full-fledged disaster.According to interviews with numerous sources, all of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity, it appears team employees began airing serious complaints that eventually made their way to new owner Wilf.In a three-month period, the employees had witnessed Foley reduce a staffer to tears for a paperwork mistake. They knew coach Brad Childress had caught him berating assistant coaches, and they had seen him rebuke maintenance workers for offenses as minor as an uneven paint job.Most of all, they were concerned about thinly veiled threats Foley made about the future of the personnel department.Foley, according to the sources, warned a secretary to stay home Monday because he planned a "bloodbath" -- apparently, a mass firing of scouts and administrators.Foley presided over the draft in near-mutinous conditions, according to the sources, and Wilf ended another turbulent chapter in team history by firing him "for cause" Monday. Foley plans to grieve the decision, claiming he was the victim of a Machiavellian power play executed by Childress and others. Foley's attorney, Jeffrey Kessler, said Wednesday he would not address specific issues regarding the termination. Kessler did not return a phone call Thursday.Was Foley thrown under the bus by colleagues who expected him to be their patsy? Or was the damage self-inflicted, qualifying him as one of the all-time flameouts in NFL history?Most sources suggest the latter scenario, even while placing some blame on the Vikings for being unaware of -- or not placing enough importance on -- Foley's history of brash behavior and his undistinguished scouting record while working in San Diego and Jacksonville for the previous 12 years.Most NFL observers, in fact, were stunned when the Vikings hired him Jan. 26, considering it proof that, regardless of title and public import, the job never was intended to carry significant personnel authority. In truth, only one major move had Foley's fingerprints on it: The acquisition of free agent linebacker Ben Leber, whom Foley had seen play for San Diego while working for the Chargers.While he might have endorsed others' recommendations in personnel evaluations, Foley approached some aspects of the job as if he were a quasi-general manager. In some ways, the Vikings lost control over him as he moved into the office previously assigned to the head coach, took a global view on matters not specifically in his purview and committed three gaffes magnified by his unintended public profile.The first came in his introductory news conference, when he told reporters that the Vikings -- who are seeking some $400 million in public support for a new stadium -- would no longer discuss their football business in public. He twice admitted to embellishing his media biography and r?sum?, making no effort to correct the second set of errors after admitting the first. Most recently, he referred to second-round draft choice Tarvaris Jackson, who is black, as a "boy."The Vikings hope to use the r?sum? issue to extricate themselves from paying his three-year contract, but the consequences will not end there. When the dust settles, Wilf will be forced to reevaluate the leadership structure he hoped would carry him through his early years of ownership.Who, if anyone, will he hold responsible for vetting and hiring Foley? According to the sources, the committee that ran the process -- Childress, along with vice presidents Rob Brzezinski and Kevin Warren -- was split. Wilf sided with those who favored Foley.Will Wilf replace Foley with another outsider, promote from within, or eliminate the position entirely? Will he consider hiring or promoting a single executive to run day-to-day operations at Winter Park, avoiding the inevitable issues of trust and cooperation required in a committee system?For now, Wilf is immersed in damage control. Unfortunately for him, it has been the hallmark of his brief tenure.Kevin Seifert ? kseifert@startribune.com</div>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (FSUViking @ May 5 2006, 04:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><span style="color:#993399">Foley was a fucking douchebag and deserved this.</span></div>Yeah after reading that article you just posted, I'm gonna have to agree.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JHair @ May 5 2006, 06:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (FSUViking @ May 5 2006, 04:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><span style="color:#993399">Foley was a fucking douchebag and deserved this.</span></div>Yeah after reading that article you just posted, I'm gonna have to agree.</div>Me too
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BrianUrlacher54 @ May 5 2006, 10:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JHair @ May 5 2006, 06:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (FSUViking @ May 5 2006, 04:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><span style="color:#993399">Foley was a fucking douchebag and deserved this.</span></div>Yeah after reading that article you just posted, I'm gonna have to agree.</div>Me too</div>He fucked up the vikes draft really badly. Ryan Cook? Tarvaris Jackson?
<span style="color:#993399">I doubt he had much input in the draft if they were considering his termination before the draft even rolled around. And Childress was the one who liked Jackson. </span>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (FSUViking @ May 6 2006, 11:48 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><span style="color:#993399">I doubt he had much input in the draft if they were considering his termination before the draft even rolled around. And Childress was the one who liked Jackson. </span></div>Exactly.
