If you ask Trump's voters - long story short - from a drag queen shows in kindergartens. They would probably like their kids not to be so called "sex workers" as well. As for Europe, left side brings more migrants from countries, where women and lgbt are less than dogs, so again, you don't want your kids to meet them on the street. I don't really know if migrants cousing same problems in USA. As for second part, funnily enough teens are biggest supporters of existential threat, maybe because their brains are young enough not to know world have new existential threat every 20 years. It is not the first time I see bringing teens as experts we should listen to.
Glad they're focused on the important issues facing today's times like kindergarten drag shows and sex workers versus the trivial shit like global warming and...generally anything else.
From Well, from the other side it looks like Lgbt+ is most important issue whole world have to address this days, so fair play.
So their biggest fear is something that will never happen, whereas they're not afraid of the terrible things that are already happening? Sounds like you don't think much of Trump voters. 1. What's your first language? I'm guessing this is what you get when you run it through Google translate? 2. Nice to know that "the right"'s first concerns are for the welfare of "women and lgbt" You genuinely lost me here. I'm sure it made sense in the original... Russian?
It’ll happen once or twice but that’s all it takes to justify the hatred; model minority syndrome and all that. As inferior beings we have to be perfect to be seen as human, where they can be imperfect because they are gods chosen or whatever. So when, inevitably, a single trans woman does something heinous, all trans women will be painted as that bad and then shunning or killing them for the crime of potentially being bad is justified. It’s classic out-group homogeneity, a way of making sense of the world. Seeing everyone as individuals takes a lot of work and is not what our brains were designed to do; it’s a layer of software that sits on top of the hardware. But if we strive for better in ourselves we have to accept the effort and make the effort.
At todays house oversight comm. hearing. SS director Kim Cheatle admitted being told by the FBI, how many empty shell casings were found on the roof. However... Cheatle refused to report this info during the hearing, on multiple occasions. Sure looks like a coverup. The number of shells on the roof would establish if there was only one shooter. On a side note. More recordings have been analyzed. The CNN camera directly in front of Trump suggest shots were fired from 400', 800', and possibly one from 1400'. The 800' shot matches the distance to a water tower. There is very fuzzy video of the water tower during the shooting. It appears to show someone on top of the tower. I have questions on how the recordings are analyzed. But, the pile of red flags is getting larger.
Did somebody suggest we vote for a drug addict? What do guns have to do with it? The best immediate action we can take to address climate change is a carbon tax with a progressive dividend. This would pay you more money than your rising costs. The problem is that we have let corporations convince us not to do this. I'm not sure where you are, but kids are safer now than they ever have been in the history of the world.
Two updates During the House Oversight comm hearing, SS director Cheatle refused to answer almost all of the questions. Every politican questioning her became so upset, they wanted her resignation, or to fire her. She is totally incompetetant. She is hiding something. Video has been made public of the SS advance team at the rally site. This was several days before the shooting. 6 people appear to be discussing security plans. Guess who appears to be in charge. The most incompetetant SS agent on the day of the shooting. The one that did not even know how to holster her pistol.
Something I've learned over this whole thing is how much people don't know what the secret service actually do. Most of them work on financial crimes.
Hey man thanks for the question, it's a great question and I'm gonna get to it in a second. But first I just wanted to say: Yo man if you think it's a wild theory that the CIA and military industrial complex would rather not assassinate the hugely popular candidate that will make them the most money possible while also holding the same social and political views they do, you might be in too deep. Unless you think the CIA and military industrial complex have somehow been taken over by marxist trans librarians or whatever, then yeah, that idea makes total sense, I retract my statement, and good job for noticing. So yeah anyway, to answer your question: no, I haven't, but thanks for asking.
The first 3 shots, and the next 5 shots sound very different, and the following burst of 5 shots produces an echo. But they all came from about 150 yards from the analysis I've seen. We have one video where Crooks is in frame when the first shot goes up, and there is absolutely 0 movement. Granted, it's not the best quality video, but we should see some recoil. It'll be very interesting to collect more detailed testimony of those who observed Crooks on the roof during the shooting.
So why did 50 former top intelligence officials jump at the chance to lie about the Hunter Biden laptop? Why did Chuck Shumer say that Trump had crossed the intelligence community, and they have 6 ways from Sunday to get back at him?
We have 1 report that a Sniper made a "1 in a million" shot to take out Crooks, and another that law enforcement also shot him. The problem is, we only have 1 bullet on the audio record aside from the 8 that flew at Trump. The picture of Crooks dead body appears to show an entrance wound through the right side of his neck, which is an odd trajectory from where the snipers were. It does however line up perfectly with the 2nd story building the officers were said to have been occupying. On the other hand we have eye witness testimony that officers were in the 2nd story windows but didn't actually do anything. There is really no way to make sense of this fiasco aside from an intentional stand down. Witnesses also say the story that the officer was boosted up to the roof and Crooks pointed a gun at him is a lie. It also makes zero sense, as why would they do that when they had access to the building behind him.
Lol So multiple pros couldn't hit an easier wide open shot they had prepared for on a central target at the perfect distance, from an elevated position while police can locate, identity, and eliminate a target in a few seconds with one single shot. Wow. These police are obviously very highly trained. A tip of the hat to how well prepared and capable the security force was.
Not sure that she had any direct responsibility for the security plans that day, but way too big of a blunder for heads not to roll.
