That this bothers Collin Rugg isn't a surprise. He tweets dumb stuff for pay. That this triggers you is just strange.
There's nothing quite as socially awkward, BTW, as groping your own teenage daughter in public and getting big mad when someone downplays the size of your crowds.
If by "shit" you mean the top podcast in the world, who gets more views than all of the twats at MSNBC combined, then yeah...
The Rogan/Trump video has 37 million views on Youtube alone. If you add in Spotify, Apple and other platforms, it easily has 50+ million views. For comparison, the top rated non-conservative cable news show Anderson Cooper, averages under 400k per show. So why wouldn't Kamala be tripping all over herself at the opportunity to be on his show? It's his format. 2-3 hours, unedited, non-scripted, open conversation. Why can't Kamala abide by those terms?
Kamala went on the Call Her Daddy podcast, which is the second most popular pocast in the world. To say its a massively popular podcast with women would be an understatement. It’s huge. That episode got 700k listeners. This is a podcast where the average episode nets 10 million listeners. Their own regular listeners hard passed on that episode to the tune of a 1/10 margin. Holy fuck. Kamala Harris is insanely unpopular as a figure worth listening to. There’s just nothing there from a personality or even policy standpoint. She’s a cardboard cutout.
Jonboy might be getting his info from the ever reliable https://bitcoinmagazine.com/politic...too-big-to-rig-the-bitcoin-candidate-will-win Bitcoin magazine. Which mentions the 700K views. On Youtube. Of course, youtube isn't spotify, apple music, etc. So though she has millions of subscribers on those platforms, there's no data I can see that shows how many people listened to the episode on places where most people will listen to their podcasts. As for the Youtube channel, https://www.youtube.com/@callherdaddy/videos I see 14 video interviews that she has done in the last 2 months on there. Going from the most recent one, they have viewership of 52K, 61K, 732K, 61K, 25K, 36K, 37K, 185K, 68K, 363K, 60K, 15K, 323K, 112K. An average viewership of just barely over 100K per episode. So the Kamala one actually did 7 times MORE than the average. And if you look at the most recent ones right around her, closer to 10-15 times higher. But let's not let facts get in the way of a good distortion of information.
We got a week left until we get to see the more popular candidate. I know I tune into tons of Trump media engagements because I’m so interested what kind of dumb shit will come out of his mouth next
You could just tell us where you got the "information". But you won't even do that, because it would reveal too much. barfo
I'd watch a Trump interview before I'd watch a Kamala interview, for sure. For the same reason that you like to look at car crashes. Why would anyone assume that getting to know Trump better would make one more likely to vote for him?
Yes. Her podcast. Off of spotify. Apple podcasts. Etc. I just showed you the viewership #s that were the 700K you were so shocked about. I believe she has 1 million subscribers on youtube. 700K viewed it. Which is more than everything she has done recently. As I showed you. You come in posting bullshit, with nothing to actually back it up is laughable but to be expected. You are taking data point A and Data point 2 and thinking you're making a point. It's not surprising you whiffed badly. You saw the information parroted on some other bullshit website and got half a chubby to run on here and own the libs. And it failed. The party that enjoys so much doing their own research never seem interested in sharing that hard work. Must be proprietary.
You’re welcome to share the numbers for the Kamala episode with everyone any time. Your endzone celebration came a little early on this one.
I gave you the 700K number you thought was listens but are actually views on youtube. Where she does not have 10 million people watching. That's the 700K being parroted about. Would love to see proof to your claim that out of her 10 million followers, only 700K listened on different podcast sites.
Anyways, my argument is bullshit, and shown to be so, so I'll just move on and post more made up shit tomorrow!
I showed you new numbers that look even worse than the original ones i shared. But your only fleeting argument is to remain hung up on a technicality so you can at least be right about something. Even if it misses the whole point.
