Re: John Clayton's 53-man roster Didn't see it posted anywhere so....http://espn.go.com/swf/nfl/clayton/clayton_53man_index.html
Re: John Clayton's 53-man roster Why isn't Champ Bailey on there starting at CB and Marcus Trufant is...? To be honest I think he could have put together a better team then that.
Re: John Clayton's 53-man roster And if he doesn't want to pay his players so much then why not start Chris Cooley and have Mercedes Lewis backin him up? And he should've got D'Brickashaw Ferguson instead of Walter Jones.
Re: John Clayton's 53-man roster <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Punisher @ Jul 13 2006, 08:22 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>And if he doesn't want to pay his players so much then why not start Chris Cooley and have Mercedes Lewis backin him up? And he should've got D'Brickashaw Ferguson instead of Walter Jones.</div>Walter Jones is the best LT in the NFL. I like D'Brickashaw but he isnt even on that level yet. And the reason Champ Bailey isnt on there is because he makes too much money and isnt worth the salary.
Re: John Clayton's 53-man roster If I was building a 53 man roster I would of found a way to fit Champ Bailey in at CB. I realize he costs a lot but he could have chosen cheaper backups with equal strengths. I mean he DID find a way to get the pricey Peyton Manning on the roster...
Re: John Clayton's 53-man roster <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JHair @ Jul 13 2006, 08:56 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>If I was building a 53 man roster I would of found a way to fit Champ Bailey in at CB. I realize he costs a lot but he could have chosen cheaper backups with equal strengths. I mean he DID find a way to get the pricey Peyton Manning on the roster...</div>Peyton Manning is also the top offensive player in the league. Champ Bailey is a great cornerback, but DeAngelo Hall and Marcus Trufant are also damn good corners for a fraction of the price.
Re: John Clayton's 53-man roster This was done putting the best team together of players w/their current salaries and staying within the salary cap. It's not an all-star team.Here's the article about it: http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/stor...john&id=2511045
Re: John Clayton's 53-man roster Starting long snapper baby! WOOOOOOOOOOOOAnd Incognito backup up at both guard spots.
Re: John Clayton's 53-man roster <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (gopackers4 @ Jul 13 2006, 08:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>No Packers AJ Hawk should be a backup</div>Hawk is spendy, Vilma isn't. Vilma should be there.
Re: John Clayton's 53-man roster mannign was there because while he is expensive, he allowed to contract to be loaded with incentives, so it doesnt hurt the cap as much.
Re: John Clayton's 53-man roster <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Nebkreb @ Jul 16 2006, 11:47 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>mannign was there because while he is expensive, he allowed to contract to be loaded with incentives, so it doesnt hurt the cap as much.</div>not to mention that he is the best and hardest working QB in the whole league.
Re: John Clayton's 53-man roster <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (bobferg @ Jul 16 2006, 02:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Nebkreb @ Jul 16 2006, 11:47 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>mannign was there because while he is expensive, he allowed to contract to be loaded with incentives, so it doesnt hurt the cap as much.</div>not to mention that he is the best and hardest working QB in the whole league.</div>He rivals David Carr for the least injury prone QB as well....
Re: John Clayton's 53-man roster <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>He rivals David Carr for the least injury prone QB as well....</div>Brett Favre?
Re: John Clayton's 53-man roster <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (gopackers4 @ Jul 16 2006, 03:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>He rivals David Carr for the least injury prone QB as well....</div>Brett Favre?</div>Favre gets injured fairly often actually, he's just tough and plays through it.
Re: John Clayton's 53-man roster <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jon_Vilma @ Jul 16 2006, 04:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (bobferg @ Jul 16 2006, 02:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Nebkreb @ Jul 16 2006, 11:47 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>mannign was there because while he is expensive, he allowed to contract to be loaded with incentives, so it doesnt hurt the cap as much.</div>not to mention that he is the best and hardest working QB in the whole league.</div>He rivals David Carr for the least injury prone QB as well....</div>how does he rival carr? He has been in the league twice as long as carr. Manning broke his jaw and only missed one snap. that is bad ass. You can call him a pussy all you want, but playing with a broken jaw is pretty damn hardcore.
Re: John Clayton's 53-man roster <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (bobferg @ Jul 16 2006, 04:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>not to mention that he is the best and hardest working QB in the whole league.</div>yep, gonna have to agree with you there
Re: John Clayton's 53-man roster <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Nebkreb @ Jul 16 2006, 11:47 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>mannign was there because while he is expensive, he allowed to contract to be loaded with incentives, so it doesnt hurt the cap as much.</div>Many of the players on this team are playing on incentive-laden contracts, final years of their rookie contracts, or initial years of a new contract which are all cap-friendly. There would be no way to keep about half of this team together after a year.
