They do, and frankly they absolutely needed to change the culture/core last summer and didn't. It better happen this summer.
Moving Goodrow changed the culture, Igor needs to make 2 of those saves and should expect criticism every time he blows a game. When Ryan Strome can park in front of the net unmolested you know you have a soft defense, maybe they cam switch Rempe to defense and K'Andre to wing. Last year the regular season Rangers had the ability to turn it on and put the puck in the goal, this year's team struggles to crisply pass the puck around on the PP let alone get shots on goal. Give Messier a shot behind the bench.
Igor should expect no criticism. This dickless, gutless team is first overall in the league letting up high scoring chances. Fucking disgrace. Blame the goalie. Same shit our retard fan base did for most of the Lundqvist years.
He will be the highest paid goalie in the league starting next season. He is not immune to a criticism. He should be called out for any soft goals he allows just like the rest of the team. God forbid he gets criticized. He should be held accountable just like anyone else on the team. Everyone should be held accountable.
Moving Goodrow did not change shit. Carrick does the same what Goodrow does for a much cheaper contract
Goodrow single handedly won a game in that dismal Debs series but the last kid picked in gym class who brings politics into the board would be clueless about things of that nature.
Yeah because Goodrow and his 8 points would make a huge difference this season. If you want to change the team culture you need to move top vets. Not some gritty fourth line schmuck who was overpaid for what he brought. His contract needed to be moved. That was the right move. It probably made other vets sulking like little bitches as dump said above
What changed is another year together of an old stale core that went as far as they could go and was done together. Combine that with the team losing players and adding no one of any value last summer, and the sulking unhappiness of your captain and whatever you want to call the drama of last summer, and you have the mess that is the 24/25 NYR. It had nothing to do with WAY overpaid Goodrow not being here. It was done for this core after the Florida series, and again it was obvious to anyone really paying attention. Brooks said it, other writers say it, I said it, Mess on this board said it. It was obvious, and core changes didn't happen. Now we are where we are, and we look forward to hopefully a productive summer.
I like Carrick, great pickup for $1 mil but Drury also traded for Reilly Smith for more money and 2 draft picks. Goodrow was more of a role player than scorer who had your back and the experience of winning 2 Cups, the Rangers may have come up short postseason but they had no problem making the playoffs with Goodrow on the team.
Traded away 2nd and 5th round picks for Smith - got back Soucy for Smith. The reading public can decide if that was a good transaction, and worth it for 3rd line wing Smith, who was asked to fill a role above his capabilities on the 1st line. As for the Goodrow/Carrick swap, I think that's like rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic. Both are decent/okay 4th line options, but neither really adds a ton of value big picture, and Carrick does it for a lot less money. Goodrow didn't help the Rangers avoid embarrassment against NJ two years ago, not his fault, but he's also not some savior that would have saved everything for this stale team this season.
Biggest problems of this organization are not role players. It's coaches not holding players accountable. Especially the vets. No defensive system. The organization continuing to play its top scoring forward prospects like role players. Not giving them lots of PP time. Being terrible at drafting centers.
It's interesting, if we are being honest, not holding the vets accountable has been a Rangers issue for YEARS no matter who the coach is. It makes me wonder if it's more of an internal pressure thing, than a coaching decision. Like this is NYC, you must play the big names we bring in to draw in fans no matter how well they are playing or if they suck. I think it's a Rangers organizational mandate, not a coaching decision. I have seen it go on for far too long, with too many coaches and overpaid vets to not see it that way. I guess that's also why the Rangers haven't won S for decades outside of 94. The Rangers recipe is big marquee names for the NYC crowd, over a cohesive well-balanced hard-working team. The big marquee names can do whatever they want without accountability, because that's what the NYR are all about to dazzle Broadway, all sizzle no steak. They just about never build the team the right way and reward the right deserving players. The best example from this season is Zibanejad. The fact that he kept playing major minutes, despite playing awful lazy hockey, and refusing to shoot, is mind-blowing. How Lav hasn't said to him either you shoot the puck more or you're benched, is crazy. But, just like every coach before him, Lav has to play the big marquee names no matter what and try to win at all costs with those big marquee names. That's the Rangers organizational strategy in a nutshell.
Lost in the shuffle of that debacle was Laf finally scoring his 100th goal, only took 371 games, he'll be graying when he hits 200!
Are you surprised the fucking number one pick in the draft still doesn’t play the first power unit full-time because we keep hiring coaches that suck off these veterans cocks
