<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Vikings | Pinkston officially signedSat, 2 Sep 2006 14:06:14 -0700Vikings.com reports the Minnesota Vikings have officially signed WR Todd Pinkston.</div>
Hhahah its funny how anything Eagles related Childress takes interest in, not to mention he seeks trades with the Eagles as well like with Baskett...He also wanted A.J. Feeley.My question is, why the hell does he want Todd? He SUCKED in Philly. Biggest pussy WR ever. GO AFTER CHARLES ROGERS.
Considering he was cut by a team with a lack of recievers, this is a bad move. I dont see the Vikings going anywhere anyways. I guess he was the best choice since Koren Robinson is out for the year I believe.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Street @ Sep 4 2006, 12:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Considering he was cut by a team with a lack of recievers, this is a bad move. I dont see the Vikings going anywhere anyways. I guess he was the best choice since Koren Robinson is out for the year I believe.</div>So.. if according to you, the vikings aren't going anywhere, then what do they have to lose?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (PurplePeopleEaters @ Sep 4 2006, 09:45 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Street @ Sep 4 2006, 12:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Considering he was cut by a team with a lack of recievers, this is a bad move. I dont see the Vikings going anywhere anyways. I guess he was the best choice since Koren Robinson is out for the year I believe.</div>So.. if according to you, the vikings aren't going anywhere, then what do they have to lose?</div>Nothing at all. But, why go after Pinkston? I would much rather try to take a chance with Charles Rogers for cheaper.
I dont know why they signed him. For the Eagles he was never a threat at all. He was scared of physical contact and if someone bump him on the line he is scared for the rest of the play.
