Taylors running well. Brad Johnson hasn't had a incomplete and we only have a field goal and are down 6-3 to the 49ers? What?Penilties. Damn them.
Who calls plays for the Vikings? Whoever does should be fired. He is the worst play-caller I've seen in my life. And this has gone on all season.1st and 10 - Air it out deep/run it2nd and 10 - Air it out deep/run it3rd and 10 - 1-2 yard screen pass4th and 8 - puntIt's horrible. But It's funny too since I don't' like the Vikings.
WOOOOO!!!!Whatever we did on defense today, we better do the rest of the year!!We actually held someone under 25 points!!Offense was dead, but whatever.Anyway you look at it, the 49ers are 3-5, and have an outside shot at winning 7 games this season.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (iknobaer @ Nov 5 2006, 08:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>WOOOOO!!!!Whatever we did on defense today, we better do the rest of the year!!We actually held someone under 25 points!!Offense was dead, but whatever.Anyway you look at it, the 49ers are 3-5, and have an outside shot at winning 7 games this season.</div>You held the single worse passing offense in the history of football to 3 points. congrats.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (PurplePeopleEaters @ Nov 5 2006, 06:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Brad Childress calls plays and sucks at it. It's about as funny as dead babies.</div>What's the difference between a dead baby and a piece of shit?I don't eat things that taste like shit.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (AdropOFvenom @ Nov 6 2006, 11:03 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Start Bollinger!Brad Johnson clearly isnt getting the job done. :thumbsup:</div>I'm starting to think that Bollinger needs to go in but Brad isn't the total root of the problem. The o-line isn't getting protection, the receivers aren't getting open, and the playcalling sucks. How much harder can it be for brad?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (PurplePeopleEaters @ Nov 6 2006, 08:28 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (AdropOFvenom @ Nov 6 2006, 11:03 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Start Bollinger!Brad Johnson clearly isnt getting the job done. :thumbsup:</div>I'm starting to think that Bollinger needs to go in but Brad isn't the total root of the problem. The o-line isn't getting protection, the receivers aren't getting open, and the playcalling sucks. How much harder can it be for brad? </div>Well, I agree with all of that, but theres also hope that a new QB can bring some life into the Offense. Kinda like the Cowboys bringing in Tony Romo. Making a change that drastic makes everyone fear for their job and try to play better. Then in the offseason they can worry about adressing their needs, and actually hiring an Offensive Coordinator for the playcalling. :whistling:
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Capt. Comeback @ Nov 6 2006, 03:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Why start Bollinger over Tarvaris?</div>I don't want to throw him in too early. He's the QB of the future and needs some time learning the system before he gets the nod. Plus i'm looking at the depth chart when thinking about this. brooks is #2, Tarvaris is #3. I'm guessing that Childress would put in brooks first.
In the paper a couple weeks ago Brad Childress said it'd take a travishamockery for Tavaris Jackson to play this season. (He didn't call it a travishamockery, but he used some other word meaning nearly impossible)
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Capt. Comeback @ Nov 6 2006, 12:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Why start Bollinger over Tarvaris?</div>Tavaris Jackson was a very raw prospect from Divison 1-AA College Football, it's a huge jump to go from 1-AA football to NFL football in just one season, which is why they are going to be as slow as possible with working him into the fold. Kinda like how Steve McNair barely played his rookie season for the same reasons.
