Season's half over, Reggie has been a bust as a RB so far this season. What do you think?EDIT: What happened to the poll?
Bears fan = stupid.Mark Anderson = better team = 7.5 sacks, 14 tacklesMario Williams = shitty team = 4.5 sacks, 25 tacklesNow I guess because Kampman has 9.5 sacks, more than everyone, he is better than say... Julius Peppers.Back to Bush vs Williams.... Bush and Williams are doing not-so-well right now. I think Mario is contributing more to the team than Bush as of right now.
They have their moments, like Bush having like 40+ receptions and Mario Williams' 4.5 Sacks, but overall they have both been a disapointment so far. They're both not living up to their potential, so it's hard to go either way on this one.In the long run though, id take my chances with Bush over Mario Williams anyday though.
IMO, it's not only hard to compare them because it's their rookie year, but I don't think you can even compare a RB with a DE. I mean, come on. It's a completely different position, and I still say Houston made the right choice. They have a decent RB, who unfortunately got hurt, and a couple years ago they passed on Julius Peppers for Carr, I just don't think they wanted to make the same mistake. Their OL was terrible, and their defense was pretty bad, so Bush wasn't their #1 need. In the long run, you can't compare a RB to a DE, because it's a completely different position and they get completely different stats.P.S. There's a pretty good chance the Texans will be able to get Adrian Peterson or Marshawn Lynch in the upcoming draft, so yeah, I think they made the right choice...
I find this :LMAO: :LMAO: :LMAO: because....Houston has the Defensive Rookie of the Year, but it's not Mario Williams, it's DeMeco Ryans.New Orleans has the Offensive Rookie of the Year, but it's not Reggie Bush, it's Marques Colston.
