Here is the stats of a Wide Reciever. Let me know if you think they are Hall-Of-Fame worthy or not. After I get a few opinions I will say who it is. Year--Rec--Yds--Avg--TD1996 63 844 13.4 8 1997 70 963 13.8 5 1998 83 1131 13.6 10 1999 89 1170 13.1 8 2000 71 874 12.3 8 2001 106 1266 11.9 1 2002 76 1088 14.3 5 2003 45 600 13.3 3 2004 70 981 14.0 6 2005 71 839 11.8 6 2006 43 516 12.0 3 TOTAL 787 10272 13.1 63
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (AdropOFvenom @ Nov 19 2006, 10:42 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Here is the stats of a Wide Reciever. Let me know if you think they are Hall-Of-Fame worthy or not. After I get a few opinions I will say who it is. Year--Rec--Yds--Avg--TD1996 63 844 13.4 8 1997 70 963 13.8 5 1998 83 1131 13.6 10 1999 89 1170 13.1 8 2000 71 874 12.3 8 2001 106 1266 11.9 1 2002 76 1088 14.3 5 2003 45 600 13.3 3 2004 70 981 14.0 6 2005 71 839 11.8 6 2006 43 516 12.0 3 TOTAL 787 10272 13.1 63</div>Honestly, I don't think so. Compared to most recievers he has had 1 very good season (1998) then had a very nice season in 2001, with the exception of touchdowns. If you ask me, it looks like his career hasn't been consistant. A true professional of HOF quality shows consistancy despite changes in environment et cetera.
No based on those stats.No based on who it is.Though, he is one of the best blocking WR's in the NFL...
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (KyleOrton18 @ Nov 19 2006, 10:19 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>who is this??</div>Answer the Question, Hall of famer based on numbers or not. :thumbsup:
Best blocking? Probably Keyshawn then, cause I don't think Ward played back in the mid-1990s.I don't think the stats are really HoF worthy. Maybe HoF ballot, but not really HoF.
No. Only had one spectacular season. (1998) If you want to get into the hall of fame as a WR you have to put up 1000 yard seasons every year or at least get to the 10 TD mark if you don't get the 1000. Plus I found out who it is and I would have said no even more forcefully had I known who it was previously.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Uptown @ Nov 20 2006, 05:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Nope. Not consistant enough.</div>Have to agree... Keyshawn isnt consistant and that year off from the Bucs I think really messed up his chances.
I'll give you the stats of a WR who should make the HOF though, most underrated WR of all time:| Year | G | Rec Yards Y/R TD| 1988 | 16 | 55 791 14.4 1 || 1989 | 16 | 90 1423 15.8 12 || 1990 | 16 | 67 1105 16.5 6 || 1991 | 16 | 69 961 13.9 4 || 1992 | 16 | 108 1461 13.5 13 || 1993 | 16 | 112 1274 11.4 11 || 1994 | 16 | 94 1119 11.9 18 |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+Total 595 8134 13.7 65 5 Pro BowlsHis totals aren't anything amazing (except the 9+ TD's per season), but look at that Year-by-Year statline.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jon_Vilma @ Nov 20 2006, 02:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I'll give you the stats of a WR who should make the HOF though, most underrated WR of all time:| Year | G | Rec Yards Y/R TD| 1988 | 16 | 55 791 14.4 1 || 1989 | 16 | 90 1423 15.8 12 || 1990 | 16 | 67 1105 16.5 6 || 1991 | 16 | 69 961 13.9 4 || 1992 | 16 | 108 1461 13.5 13 || 1993 | 16 | 112 1274 11.4 11 || 1994 | 16 | 94 1119 11.9 18 |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+Total 595 8134 13.7 65 5 Pro BowlsHis totals aren't anything amazing (except the 9+ TD's per season), but look at that Year-by-Year statline.</div>4 Great years....but not much in longevity. That's a tough one. I see the case, but if you let him in then you have to start letting people like Terrell Davis, Tiki Barber, and Priest Holmes in who really had 4 great years among an otherwise brief or mediocre career (brief in this case).
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (AdropOFvenom @ Nov 20 2006, 06:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jon_Vilma @ Nov 20 2006, 02:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I'll give you the stats of a WR who should make the HOF though, most underrated WR of all time:| Year | G | Rec Yards Y/R TD| 1988 | 16 | 55 791 14.4 1 || 1989 | 16 | 90 1423 15.8 12 || 1990 | 16 | 67 1105 16.5 6 || 1991 | 16 | 69 961 13.9 4 || 1992 | 16 | 108 1461 13.5 13 || 1993 | 16 | 112 1274 11.4 11 || 1994 | 16 | 94 1119 11.9 18 |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+Total 595 8134 13.7 65 5 Pro BowlsHis totals aren't anything amazing (except the 9+ TD's per season), but look at that Year-by-Year statline.</div>4 Great years....but not much in longevity. That's a tough one. I see the case, but if you let him in then you have to start letting people like Terrell Davis, Tiki Barber, and Priest Holmes in who really had 4 great years among an otherwise brief or mediocre career (brief in this case).</div>The player who's stats are listed above's career was tragically ended by a neck injury. He was a stud until he was injured. Even his rookie year was better than 95% of rookie WR's years.
Oh, I know who it is...but same thing with Terrell Davis where his career was cut short with injuries.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (KyleOrton18 @ Nov 21 2006, 05:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>who is it??</div>Sterling Sharpe (Not to be confused with Shannon)Speaking of which, Shannon Sharpe. Hall-of-Fame or not? +-------------------------+ | Receiving |+----------+-----+-------------------------+| Year TM | G | Rec Yards Y/R TD |+----------+-----+-------------------------+| 1990 den | 16 | 7 99 14.1 1 || 1991 den | 16 | 22 322 14.6 1 || 1992 den | 16 | 53 640 12.1 2 || 1993 den | 16 | 81 995 12.3 9 || 1994 den | 15 | 87 1010 11.6 4 || 1995 den | 13 | 63 756 12.0 4 || 1996 den | 15 | 80 1062 13.3 10 || 1997 den | 16 | 72 1107 15.4 3 || 1998 den | 16 | 64 768 12.0 10 || 1999 den | 5 | 23 224 9.7 0 || 2000 bal | 16 | 67 810 12.1 5 || 2001 bal | 16 | 73 811 11.1 2 || 2002 den | 12 | 61 686 11.2 3 || 2003 den | 15 | 62 770 12.4 8 |+----------+-----+-------------------------+| TOTAL | 203 | 815 10060 12.3 62 |+----------+-----+-------------------------+Id say definately.
