Re: Rank the Potential 2007 Rookie QB's 1. JaMarcus Russell*2. Brady Quinn3. Troy Smith4. Brian Brohm*5 Andre Woodson ** Junior
Re: Rank the Potential 2007 Rookie QB's 1. Brian Brohm2. Brady Quinn3. Troy Smith4. JaMarcus Russell5. Kevin Kolb6. Jordan PalmerWoodson needs another year IMO.....
Re: Rank the Potential 2007 Rookie QB's I don't really know enough about them to rank their potential or whatever.I do agree that Woodson could use another year.
Re: Rank the Potential 2007 Rookie QB's I think it really depends on what kind of system there in. Especially Quinn. Put him in the right system and he could be great but if not he could be a total bust.
Re: Rank the Potential 2007 Rookie QB's Look at Woodson's rushing stats. That's tight.-27 yards his freshman year-133 yards his sophomore year-115 yards his junior yearThat's sweet.
Re: Rank the Potential 2007 Rookie QB's <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brooksie5 @ Dec 11 2006, 04:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Look at Woodson's rushing stats. That's tight.-27 yards his freshman year-133 yards his sophomore year-115 yards his junior yearThat's sweet.</div>?So he's not a rushing QB is what you are saying?
Re: Rank the Potential 2007 Rookie QB's <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jon_Vilma @ Dec 11 2006, 11:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brooksie5 @ Dec 11 2006, 04:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Look at Woodson's rushing stats. That's tight.-27 yards his freshman year-133 yards his sophomore year-115 yards his junior yearThat's sweet.</div>?So he's not a rushing QB is what you are saying?</div>I'm saying that that is friggin sweet. How could you do that? I envy him.
Re: Rank the Potential 2007 Rookie QB's 1. Troy Smith - I've become a believer that Troy Smith has the tools to be a successful NFL quarterback. He's got a nice arm with good accuracy, he doesn't tuck and run like most scrambling quarterbacks but he can tuck and run if it's the last option. He's proved he can beat rank teams with scoring as well (see Michigan, Texas game). Sure, he's short but so is Drew Brees and Mike Vick.2. Brady Quinn - There's not much you can't like about this guy but I just don't see the great quarterback everyone is talking about. He struggles against good college defenses so you can't expect him to have success going against top NFL defenses. You can't give the excuse that he lacks weapons cause McKnight and Samardzjia are both very good. His line was a little suspect but he made too many stupid decisions. He might benefit from not having a huge learning curve with NFL offenses.3. JaMarcus Russell - He's an athletic freak. Cannon arm with good accuracy at times. I like how he can run and throw which makes him a bigger threat. His build honestly reminds me of Vince Young but the difference is that Russell isn't the winner that Vince Young is. Vince Young finds ways to get it done at the end of the game. With JaMarcus, you're never sure what version you're getting and against ranked teams he fades.4. Brian Brohm - I think he should leave next year but if he goes 2nd round, he could be a steal. He basically single handedly led Louisville to the Big East BCS bowl game. Without Michael Bush, he was a killer on offense and most people can't name anyone else on that offense. He's a winner but against suspect competition since the Big East isn't exactly the Big Ten. He has all the tools to be successful but the injury factor is always something a GM is afraid of since he has 2 reconstructed knees.
Re: Rank the Potential 2007 Rookie QB's <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (chang @ Dec 12 2006, 04:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>4. Brian Brohm - I think he should leave next year but if he goes 2nd round, he could be a steal. He basically single handedly led Louisville to the Big East BCS bowl game. Without Michael Bush, he was a killer on offense and most people can't name anyone else on that offense. He's a winner but against suspect competition since the Big East isn't exactly the Big Ten. He has all the tools to be successful but the injury factor is always something a GM is afraid of since he has 2 reconstructed knees.</div>The Big 10 isn't exactly the 'Big 10'.Seriously, is there a more overrated conference out there? They have 3 good teams, just like the Big East, and nothing else this year.
Re: Rank the Potential 2007 Rookie QB's <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (chang @ Dec 12 2006, 05:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>4. Brian Brohm - I think he should leave next year but if he goes 2nd round, he could be a steal. He basically single handedly led Louisville to the Big East BCS bowl game. Without Michael Bush, he was a killer on offense and most people can't name anyone else on that offense. He's a winner but against suspect competition since the Big East isn't exactly the Big Ten. He has all the tools to be successful but the injury factor is always something a GM is afraid of since he has 2 reconstructed knees.</div>Harry Douglas, Mario Urrutia, and the RB's name is something Stripling. I don't recall the other RB in that duo though, nor Stripling's first name.
Re: Rank the Potential 2007 Rookie QB's <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jon_Vilma @ Dec 13 2006, 12:19 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (chang @ Dec 12 2006, 05:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>4. Brian Brohm - I think he should leave next year but if he goes 2nd round, he could be a steal. He basically single handedly led Louisville to the Big East BCS bowl game. Without Michael Bush, he was a killer on offense and <span style="font-size:24pt;line-height:100%"><u>most</u></span> people can't name anyone else on that offense. He's a winner but against suspect competition since the Big East isn't exactly the Big Ten. He has all the tools to be successful but the injury factor is always something a GM is afraid of since he has 2 reconstructed knees.</div>Harry Douglas, Mario Urrutia, and the RB's name is something Stripling. I don't recall the other RB in that duo though, nor Stripling's first name.</div>
Re: Rank the Potential 2007 Rookie QB's <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brooksie5 @ Dec 12 2006, 10:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jon_Vilma @ Dec 13 2006, 12:19 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (chang @ Dec 12 2006, 05:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>4. Brian Brohm - I think he should leave next year but if he goes 2nd round, he could be a steal. He basically single handedly led Louisville to the Big East BCS bowl game. Without Michael Bush, he was a killer on offense and <span style="font-size:24pt;line-height:100%"><u>most</u></span> people can't name anyone else on that offense. He's a winner but against suspect competition since the Big East isn't exactly the Big Ten. He has all the tools to be successful but the injury factor is always something a GM is afraid of since he has 2 reconstructed knees.</div>Harry Douglas, Mario Urrutia, and the RB's name is something Stripling. I don't recall the other RB in that duo though, nor Stripling's first name.</div> </div>I guess I'm just in the top tier of sports fans.
Re: Rank the Potential 2007 Rookie QB's <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brooksie5 @ Dec 11 2006, 05:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Look at Woodson's rushing stats. That's tight.-27 yards his freshman year-133 yards his sophomore year-115 yards his junior yearThat's sweet.</div>So what?? Until Grossman's 22-yard scamper, he had -17 yards rushing.
Re: Rank the Potential 2007 Rookie QB's [quote name='Jon_Vilma' post='77981' date='Dec 13 2006, 12:56 AM'][quote name='Brooksie5' post='77974' date='Dec 12 2006, 10:22 PM'][quote name='Jon_Vilma' post='77972' date='Dec 13 2006, 12:19 AM'][quote name='chang' post='77953' date='Dec 12 2006, 05:02 PM']4. Brian Brohm - I think he should leave next year but if he goes 2nd round, he could be a steal. He basically single handedly led Louisville to the Big East BCS bowl game. Without Michael Bush, he was a killer on offense and <span style="font-size:24pt;line-height:100%"><u>most</u></span> people can't name anyone else on that offense. He's a winner but against suspect competition since the Big East isn't exactly the Big Ten. He has all the tools to be successful but the injury factor is always something a GM is afraid of since he has 2 reconstructed knees.[/quote]Harry Douglas, Mario Urrutia, and the RB's name is something Stripling. I don't recall the other RB in that duo though, nor Stripling's first name.[/quote] [/quote]I guess I'm just in the top tier of sports fans. [/quote]I guess so. Or you just like Louisville? Who knows..And Orton, -17 doesn't compare to -115, or any of his seasons. I don't see why people care that I put that, I think it's sweet that he could run for than many yards, and everyone goes crazy over it.
Re: Rank the Potential 2007 Rookie QB's Who cares how bad the QB is at running?? If I had a QB who could gun it but couldn't run for a lick, I'd have him over a run-happy QB any day (i.e. Vick) :whistling:
Re: Rank the Potential 2007 Rookie QB's <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (KyleOrton18 @ Dec 13 2006, 03:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Who cares how bad the QB is at running?? If I had a QB who could gun it but couldn't run for a lick, I'd have him over a run-happy QB any day (i.e. Vick) :whistling:</div>To be fair, you are essentially choosing Leftwich over Vick.
Re: Rank the Potential 2007 Rookie QB's <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brooksie5 @ Dec 11 2006, 03:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Look at Woodson's rushing stats. That's tight.-27 yards his freshman year-133 yards his sophomore year-115 yards his junior yearThat's sweet.</div>Sacks count as negative rushing yards in NCAA. It just means that he doesn't take off and scamble with the ball......not like he's making a committed effort to run for negative yards. :whistling:
Re: Rank the Potential 2007 Rookie QB's <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (AdropOFvenom @ Dec 13 2006, 04:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brooksie5 @ Dec 11 2006, 03:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Look at Woodson's rushing stats. That's tight.-27 yards his freshman year-133 yards his sophomore year-115 yards his junior yearThat's sweet.</div>Sacks count as negative rushing yards in NCAA. It just means that he doesn't take off and scamble with the ball......not like he's making a committed effort to run for negative yards. :whistling:</div>Good call. I forgot sacks count as negative rushing yards in the NCAA. And who cares if he can't run for a lick??
Re: Rank the Potential 2007 Rookie QB's I DON'T CARE IF HE CAN'T RUN!!!!!!! I JUST THOUGHT IT WAS COOL THAT THOSE WERE HIS STATS!!!!!!!! AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!
