<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jon_Vilma @ Dec 31 2006, 12:25 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (AdropOFvenom @ Dec 30 2006, 06:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Kentucky >>> Vanderbilt, yet his boy Woodson only won two more games in the regular season this season then Cutler did last year, and Cutler actually beat a Ranked Team.</div>What that really should say: Kentucky under Woodson >>> Vanderbilt under Cutler. With equally pathetic programs, Woodson was able to win 20% more games and a bowl game on top of it all, against even tougher competition.</div>The talent level between the two Schools isn't even close. 2006 Recruiting ClassesKentucky - Ranked 36thVanderbilt - Ranked 60th2005 Recruiting ClassesKentucky - Ranked 67thVanderbilt - Ranked 87th2004 Recruiting ClassesKentucky - Ranked 45thVanderbilt - Ranked 66th2003 Recuriting ClassesKentucky - Ranked 63rdVanderbilt - Ranked 78thKentucky has blown Vanderbilt away in terms of Recruiting EVERY SINGLE YEAR. Only a complete idiot would think the talent level between the 2 schools is compareable.Against what tougher competition? They both play in the SEC Eastern Division. How exactly is one tougher then the other when their schedule is almost idential and almost all quality opponents come from the SEC? (Except Vanderbilt plays Michigan and Kentucky plays Louisville this year)And at least Cutler has had a win against a Ranked Team. :whistling:
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (AdropOFvenom @ Dec 31 2006, 06:40 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jon_Vilma @ Dec 31 2006, 12:25 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (AdropOFvenom @ Dec 30 2006, 06:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Kentucky >>> Vanderbilt, yet his boy Woodson only won two more games in the regular season this season then Cutler did last year, and Cutler actually beat a Ranked Team.</div>What that really should say: Kentucky under Woodson >>> Vanderbilt under Cutler. With equally pathetic programs, Woodson was able to win 20% more games and a bowl game on top of it all, against even tougher competition.</div>The talent level between the two Schools isn't even close. 2006 Recruiting ClassesKentucky - Ranked 36thVanderbilt - Ranked 60th2005 Recruiting ClassesKentucky - Ranked 67thVanderbilt - Ranked 87th2004 Recruiting ClassesKentucky - Ranked 45thVanderbilt - Ranked 66th2003 Recuriting ClassesKentucky - Ranked 63rdVanderbilt - Ranked 78thKentucky has blown Vanderbilt away in terms of Recruiting EVERY SINGLE YEAR. Only a complete idiot would think the talent level between the 2 schools is compareable.Against what tougher competition? They both play in the SEC Eastern Division. How exactly is one tougher then the other when their schedule is almost idential and almost all quality opponents come from the SEC? (Except Vanderbilt plays Michigan and Kentucky plays Louisville this year)And at least Cutler has had a win against a Ranked Team. :whistling:</div>Lol, fine, you win, I'm a hypocrit. But I still think Woodson > Cutler.
