Dallas Cowboys, New York Giants, Philadelphia Eagles, Chicago Bears, Detroit Lions, Arizona Cardinals, Buffalo Bills, New England Patriots, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Miami Dolphins, Green Bay Packers, Minnesota Vikings, New York Jets :drool:
Arizona, Green Bay, Buffalo and New York, depending on their off-seasons, aren't going to be all that easy.
Eli Manning is horrible, and he is losing Shockey this offseason... and Tiki.The others are gonna be better, but not better than us.
I don't think any of those games are guaranteed wins, or even easy ones. I think the Jets will probably be easier than a lot of those teams you bolded due to the likely presence of Kellen Clemens.
Wow, did you watch the giants game, shockey won't be gone, and for eli, he played a great game, atleast when you trash talk back it up, so what he had off games, when we had toomer, he played fine.
If it wasn't for his last name and him being drafted #1 overall, there is no way he would start for any NFL team.
I see another 5-11 year in your near future. I don't see why you're drooling over this. Only 3 of the 16 teams had a worse record than the 'Skins this year.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Punisher @ Jan 10 2007, 05:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Eli Manning is horrible, and he is losing Shockey this offseason... and Tiki.The others are gonna be better, but not better than us.</div>1) The Giants aren't losing Shockey. Coughlin's back for at least one more year and the last thing he needs is to lose a fan favorite like Shockey to turn the fans against him even more. 2) Considering you guys were 0-3 against those teams you bolded last season (NY Giants, Tampa Bay), you have little room to consider them easy wins or whatever you're doing.3) It's too soon to get an accurate gauge on who is going to be good and who isn't. The Packers for example were 8-8 last season and won their last 4 games to end the season. With a solid offseason, they could be a really good team next season.
all the teams he bolded are good, and will be better next year, but with a healthy defense (as in not having 6 starters injured), a settled offense, campbell, and portis back (by far the best rb duo with betts), whos gonna beat the redskins?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Infamous DC @ Jan 11 2007, 01:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>all the teams he bolded are good, and will be better next year, but with a healthy defense (as in not having 6 starters injured), a settled offense, campbell, and portis back (by far the best rb duo with betts), whos gonna beat the redskins?</div>Probably Themselves, like always. :whistling:
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GaMeTiMe @ Jan 10 2007, 05:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I don't think any of those games are guaranteed wins, or even easy ones. I think the Jets will probably be easier than a lot of those teams you bolded due to the likely presence of Kellen Clemens.</div>As of right now, Clemens still has to earn the job. Which will be no easy task. :doze:
2 years ago (the 6-10 year) I said we were gonna win the SB. Last year (the 10-6 year... or should I say 13-3) I thought we were gonna suck. This year (5-11) I thought we were going to be the best team ever in the NFL. I think we will suck really bad next year :thumbsup:
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Punisher @ Jan 10 2007, 05:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Dallas Cowboys, New York Giants, Philadelphia Eagles, Chicago Bears, Detroit Lions, Arizona Cardinals, Buffalo Bills, New England Patriots, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Miami Dolphins, Green Bay Packers, Minnesota Vikings, New York Jets :drool:</div>How can you put some of those teams in bold?? The Giants, Dolphins, Vikings, Packers, and Bills are all better teams. They will be lucky if they win the games, much less win them easliy. I see them being 4-12.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MiAmI @ Jan 21 2007, 12:16 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Punisher @ Jan 10 2007, 05:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Dallas Cowboys, New York Giants, Philadelphia Eagles, Chicago Bears, Detroit Lions, Arizona Cardinals, Buffalo Bills, New England Patriots, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Miami Dolphins, Green Bay Packers, Minnesota Vikings, New York Jets :drool:</div>How can you put some of those teams in bold?? The Giants, Dolphins, Vikings, Packers, and Bills are all better teams. They will be lucky if they win the games, much less win them easliy. I see them being 4-12.</div>Yes, you're right, they're going to be better teams. But the Redskins are still better. Have you seen the Skins offense with Jason Campbell? They would've made the playoffs if it wasn't for all the injuries (especially on defense). The only players that played all games 100% healthy were Campbell, Dockery, Taylor, and Carter.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Punisher @ Jan 21 2007, 11:48 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MiAmI @ Jan 21 2007, 12:16 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Punisher @ Jan 10 2007, 05:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Dallas Cowboys, New York Giants, Philadelphia Eagles, Chicago Bears, Detroit Lions, Arizona Cardinals, Buffalo Bills, New England Patriots, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Miami Dolphins, Green Bay Packers, Minnesota Vikings, New York Jets :drool:</div>How can you put some of those teams in bold?? The Giants, Dolphins, Vikings, Packers, and Bills are all better teams. They will be lucky if they win the games, much less win them easliy. I see them being 4-12.</div>Yes, you're right, they're going to be better teams. But the Redskins are still better. Have you seen the Skins offense with Jason Campbell? They would've made the playoffs if it wasn't for all the injuries (especially on defense). The only players that played all games 100% healthy were Campbell, Dockery, Taylor, and Carter.</div>I'd hate to break this to you, but Mark Brunell was statistically better then Jason Campbell last year.Stat - Brunell - CampbellYards - 1789 (198.7/Gm) > 1297 (185.2/Gm)Completion Percentage - 62.3 > 53.1Yards Per Attempt - 6.88 > 6.27TD:INT ratio - 8:4 > 10:6Passes over 20 Yards - 24 > 13Passes over 40 Yards - 5 > 3
Oh yeah... sorry... Frank Gore is the 3rd best RB in the league, and Jon Kitna is the 4th best QB in the league. I could care less about Brunell's stats. We didn't win games with him (that's when we didn't have too many injuries - like Portis) because he threw the ball out of bounds on 3rd down. Brunell sucked under pressure, period. If we would've started Campbell in TC and pre-season then even Cowboys fans have to admit that this Redskins team would be playing where the Saints are playing right now.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Punisher @ Jan 21 2007, 01:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Oh yeah... sorry... Frank Gore is the 3rd best RB in the league, and Jon Kitna is the 4th best QB in the league. I could care less about Brunell's stats. We didn't win games with him (that's when we didn't have too many injuries - like Portis) because he threw the ball out of bounds on 3rd down. Brunell sucked under pressure, period. If we would've started Campbell in TC and pre-season then even Cowboys fans have to admit that this Redskins team would be playing where the Saints are playing right now.</div>lmao. Cmon man, the Redskins only won 3 games with Campbell, same as Brunell. :whistling:
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (AdropOFvenom @ Jan 21 2007, 05:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Punisher @ Jan 21 2007, 01:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Oh yeah... sorry... Frank Gore is the 3rd best RB in the league, and Jon Kitna is the 4th best QB in the league. I could care less about Brunell's stats. We didn't win games with him (that's when we didn't have too many injuries - like Portis) because he threw the ball out of bounds on 3rd down. Brunell sucked under pressure, period. If we would've started Campbell in TC and pre-season then even Cowboys fans have to admit that this Redskins team would be playing where the Saints are playing right now.</div>lmao. Cmon man, the Redskins only won 3 games with Campbell, same as Brunell. :whistling:</div><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Punisher @ Jan 21 2007, 04:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Oh yeah... sorry... Frank Gore is the 3rd best RB in the league, and Jon Kitna is the 4th best QB in the league. I could care less about Brunell's stats. We didn't win games with him (that's when we didn't have too many <span style="font-size:24pt;line-height:100%">injuries</span> - like Portis) because he threw the ball out of bounds on 3rd down. Brunell sucked under pressure, period. If we would've started Campbell in TC and pre-season then even Cowboys fans have to admit that this Redskins team would be playing where the Saints are playing right now.</div>Just give up, man...Our offense was amazing with Campbell, and our defense was amazingly terrible with Campbell (with all the gay injuries).Watch a Campbell video on YouTube or something. I prefer you watching the one against the Giants - it's long.
