Worst mock ever. First off, you called the Rams the Saints.. your football knowledge is now 0. Second off, you have the Rams drafting two OLB. Why? Tinoisamoa and Witherspoon are our two solid LBs that will start here for many years. Now we only need someone to play over Chillar/Coakley. That's 1 LB.. not 2.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (chang @ Jan 28 2007, 02:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I would like to say that Josh Wilson is a late 1st to early 3rd pick. When the combine comes out, his stock will go up pretty high because he's one of the fastest CBs. I would say he would go to a team like the Saints late 2nd (if he's still around) since they had problems with Fred Thomas all year.Or the Patriots who might lose Asante Samuel to FA.</div>You like Maryland too? :beerbang2:
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (AdropOFvenom @ Jan 28 2007, 01:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jon_Vilma @ Jan 28 2007, 10:52 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (AdropOFvenom @ Jan 28 2007, 06:16 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>- Anthony Spencer has had a very nice week himself, he's gonna go Mid Second Round at Worst now.- Piscatelli and Duckworth would be lucky to go Day 1 at all, nevermind Second Round.- Charles Johnson will go in the First 2 rounds.- Did you watch Ryan Harris at the Senior Bowl? I can't think of a single person who didn't beat him. No way he's that high. Ugoh was better then both him and Staley.- I cant see us taking Leonard with Blalock/Grubbs/Moss and even Woodley still on the board. Too much value there, we'd take him in Early Round 2 IMO if we're going to, and yes he'll be available there because he's a tweener.</div>-Spencer had an OK week. He definitely didn't hurt his stock, but when game time came he didn't do anything special until it was garbage time. And there are a LOT of good DE's this year.</div>You're overrating the game itself man.Teams don't put a ton of stock in the game because it's not like an NFL-Style game since theres no blitzing allowed. It's like watching the Pro-Bowl. Good TV, but not something that's going to hurt his value. The practices mean more then the actual game does.</div>The best playing against the best in a game environment... yeah, doesn't mean much.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brooksie5 @ Jan 28 2007, 02:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Worst mock ever. First off, you called the Rams the Saints.. your football knowledge is now 0. Second off, you have the Rams drafting two OLB. Why? Tinoisamoa and Witherspoon are our two solid LBs that will start here for many years. Now we only need someone to play over Chillar/Coakley. That's 1 LB.. not 2.</div> A typing error and 1 team loading up on something they need makes it the worst ever? Riiiggghhtt.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jon_Vilma @ Jan 28 2007, 01:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>You don't think that because all those WR's didn't pan out that they, just maybe, would be looking to upgrade? I wouldn't be surprised if their 1st round pick was spent on a WR.</div>Well, 2 of the 4 WRs mentioned have had their time come and gone so it's not like they are still around needing to make up for it. We also have plenty of young guys around already.And anyone drafted wouldn't be significantly better than anyone we currently have right away, which is what we'd be drafting for. The draft is all about the future, but you have to give some consideration to the present and consider all the holes we have on defense that need to be filled.The Titans have never been about having a great WR corp ever since the run-and-shoot days of Warren Moon left Houston, anyway. Their priorities have been the defense and the run game first and foremost. A great WR would be a luxury in our system.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jon_Vilma @ Jan 28 2007, 11:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brooksie5 @ Jan 28 2007, 02:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Worst mock ever. First off, you called the Rams the Saints.. your football knowledge is now 0. Second off, you have the Rams drafting two OLB. Why? Tinoisamoa and Witherspoon are our two solid LBs that will start here for many years. Now we only need someone to play over Chillar/Coakley. That's 1 LB.. not 2.</div> A typing error and 1 team loading up on something they need makes it the worst ever? Riiiggghhtt.</div>It does make it worst ever. Why load up on one thing they need when they have other things they need too? Why get some of everything? You're pretty much saying a team would be better off with 3 Pro Bowl caliber QBs and a weakness at RB and WR, instead of 1 Pro Bowl QB, 1 Good (or Pro Bowl) RB, and 1 good (or Pro Bowl) WR.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brooksie5 @ Jan 30 2007, 12:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jon_Vilma @ Jan 28 2007, 11:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brooksie5 @ Jan 28 2007, 02:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Worst mock ever. First off, you called the Rams the Saints.. your football knowledge is now 0. Second off, you have the Rams drafting two OLB. Why? Tinoisamoa and Witherspoon are our two solid LBs that will start here for many years. Now we only need someone to play over Chillar/Coakley. That's 1 LB.. not 2.</div> A typing error and 1 team loading up on something they need makes it the worst ever? Riiiggghhtt.</div>It does make it worst ever. Why load up on one thing they need when they have other things they need too? Why get some of everything? You're pretty much saying a team would be better off with 3 Pro Bowl caliber QBs and a weakness at RB and WR, instead of 1 Pro Bowl QB, 1 Good (or Pro Bowl) RB, and 1 good (or Pro Bowl) WR.</div>Um, 3 QB's don't play at the same time, 3 WR's, 3 CB's, and 3 LB's do... :whistling:
Plus you talked **** about the Niners...Jarrett would be alright, Im not feelin Woodley but he would be alright too.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (david81 @ Jan 30 2007, 01:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Plus you talked **** about the Niners...Jarrett would be alright, Im not feelin Woodley but he would be alright too.</div>If there was a 3-4 NT guy for yall there, that would be the pick, but putting Woodley and Lawson on the outside could terrorize QB's and help save the defense from some humiliation.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jon_Vilma @ Jan 30 2007, 02:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (david81 @ Jan 30 2007, 01:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Plus you talked **** about the Niners...Jarrett would be alright, Im not feelin Woodley but he would be alright too.</div>If there was a 3-4 NT guy for yall there, that would be the pick, but putting Woodley and Lawson on the outside could terrorize QB's and help save the defense from some humiliation.</div>I personally feel we dont need a NT early, the big ones are available in the later rounds. I want playmakers; on offense only WR, rest on D. Willis and Landry are better picks in the 1st, while Anthony Spencer would be a better OLB in my opinion in the 2nd (Or Meachem since Jarrett wouldnt be our 1st) :thumbsup:
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jon_Vilma @ Jan 27 2007, 11:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>54. Dallas - Sabby Piscitelli, S, Oregon St.</div>WTF!?!?!?! Before Rouse, Gattis, and Wendling?!?!?!? WTF do you see in him?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (david81 @ Jan 30 2007, 02:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jon_Vilma @ Jan 27 2007, 11:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>54. Dallas - Sabby Piscitelli, S, Oregon St.</div>WTF!?!?!?! Before Rouse, Gattis, and Wendling?!?!?!? WTF do you see in him?</div>The Cowboys need someone to offset Roy Williams by being a ball-hawk. Rouse can't defend the pass to save his life, Wendling is mediocre at it, and Piscitelli is just straight up more talented than Gattis.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jon_Vilma @ Jan 28 2007, 08:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'> A typing error and 1 team loading up on something they need makes it the worst ever? Riiiggghhtt.</div>I will stop watching football the day a team takes two OLBs in the first and second rounds of the draft. Witherspoon and Tinoisamoa are fine at MLB and OLB (Witherspoon may be moving outside but that remains to be seen), and Chillar and Coakley are serviceable backups, with Jon Alston fighting for a roster spot aswell. If you gave them two OLBs by accident, you should admit it because that would look better than seriously predicting they will take them back to back like that.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GaMeTiMe @ Jan 30 2007, 04:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jon_Vilma @ Jan 28 2007, 08:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'> A typing error and 1 team loading up on something they need makes it the worst ever? Riiiggghhtt.</div>I will stop watching football the day a team takes two OLBs in the first and second rounds of the draft. Witherspoon and Tinoisamoa are fine at MLB and OLB (Witherspoon may be moving outside but that remains to be seen), and Chillar and Coakley are serviceable backups, with Jon Alston fighting for a roster spot aswell. If you gave them two OLBs by accident, you should admit it because that would look better than seriously predicting they will take them back to back like that.</div>Stop Watching Football, or at least stop watching the Cowboys, Bengals, and 49ers. All of which have done it recently.OR just kill yourself you no-it-all yet no-nothing tool.
While not entirely the same, it is the same team that drafted a TE in the 2nd and 3rd round last year
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (david81 @ Jan 30 2007, 04:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>While not entirely the same, it is the same team that drafted a TE in the 2nd and 3rd round last year </div>Hell, Carolina once took a DE with all 3 of their 1st day picks.Jets took a 1st and 2nd round DE before.Bears took a 1st and 2nd round DT.Broncos spent all 3 of of their day 1 picks on CB's.Rams drafted two NT's in the same 1st round.Colts drafted a CB with both their 1st and 2nd round picks.Vikings spent their 1st and 2nd round draft picks on two DT's.Raiders took CB's with their 1st and 2nd rounc picks, 15 picks apart from each other.Chargers did the same thing... only 16 picks apart from each other.Oh, and all in the past decade.But lets not forget that the Bears took two OLB's with their 1st and 2nd round picks in 1984, both of which played instrumental roles in the '85 Bears Superbowl win (Wilber Marshall started it, Ron Rivera played often. Marshall was a 3 time Pro Bowler and Rivera is one of the great defensive minds in the NFL today.
[quote name='Jon_Vilma' post='82898' date='Jan 30 2007, 04:47 PM'][quote name='Brooksie5' post='82873' date='Jan 30 2007, 12:57 PM'][quote name='Jon_Vilma' post='82645' date='Jan 28 2007, 11:44 PM'][quote name='Brooksie5' post='82539' date='Jan 28 2007, 02:00 PM']Worst mock ever. First off, you called the Rams the Saints.. your football knowledge is now 0. Second off, you have the Rams drafting two OLB. Why? Tinoisamoa and Witherspoon are our two solid LBs that will start here for many years. Now we only need someone to play over Chillar/Coakley. That's 1 LB.. not 2.[/quote] A typing error and 1 team loading up on something they need makes it the worst ever? Riiiggghhtt.[/quote]It does make it worst ever. Why load up on one thing they need when they have other things they need too? Why get some of everything? You're pretty much saying a team would be better off with 3 Pro Bowl caliber QBs and a weakness at RB and WR, instead of 1 Pro Bowl QB, 1 Good (or Pro Bowl) RB, and 1 good (or Pro Bowl) WR.[/quote]Um, 3 QB's don't play at the same time, 3 WR's, 3 CB's, and 3 LB's do... :whistling:[/quote]Thanks captain obvious. BUT, considering we're good at 2 of the 3 LB positions.. we don't need to fill 2 or 3 of them. You're flat out stupid if you think they should/will take 2 OLBs in the first two rounds.
[quote name='Brooksie5' post='83145' date='Jan 31 2007, 03:47 PM'][quote name='Jon_Vilma' post='82898' date='Jan 30 2007, 04:47 PM'][quote name='Brooksie5' post='82873' date='Jan 30 2007, 12:57 PM'][quote name='Jon_Vilma' post='82645' date='Jan 28 2007, 11:44 PM'][quote name='Brooksie5' post='82539' date='Jan 28 2007, 02:00 PM']Worst mock ever. First off, you called the Rams the Saints.. your football knowledge is now 0. Second off, you have the Rams drafting two OLB. Why? Tinoisamoa and Witherspoon are our two solid LBs that will start here for many years. Now we only need someone to play over Chillar/Coakley. That's 1 LB.. not 2.[/quote] A typing error and 1 team loading up on something they need makes it the worst ever? Riiiggghhtt.[/quote]It does make it worst ever. Why load up on one thing they need when they have other things they need too? Why get some of everything? You're pretty much saying a team would be better off with 3 Pro Bowl caliber QBs and a weakness at RB and WR, instead of 1 Pro Bowl QB, 1 Good (or Pro Bowl) RB, and 1 good (or Pro Bowl) WR.[/quote]Um, 3 QB's don't play at the same time, 3 WR's, 3 CB's, and 3 LB's do... :whistling:[/quote]Thanks captain obvious. BUT, considering we're good at 2 of the 3 LB positions.. we don't need to fill 2 or 3 of them. You're flat out stupid if you think they should/will take 2 OLBs in the first two rounds.[/quote]Some can't see past what's in front of them, some can.
Vilma, I'd like you to actually answer why the Rams need two OLBs in the first and second rounds instead of bringing up a bunch of historical stats. I specified OUTSIDE LINEBACKERS for a reason, and all the little tidbits you threw out there were about other positions. Sorry, I didn't know about the one occurance in 1984.<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>OR just kill yourself you no-it-all yet no-nothing tool.</div>Look at Mr. Big man on campus bossing the little kiddies around Save it big man, it's just a football message board.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GaMeTiMe @ Jan 31 2007, 07:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Vilma, I'd like you to actually answer why the Rams need two OLBs in the first and second rounds instead of bringing up a bunch of historical stats. I specified OUTSIDE LINEBACKERS for a reason, and all the little tidbits you threw out there were about other positions. Sorry, I didn't know about the one occurance in 1984.<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>OR just kill yourself you no-it-all yet no-nothing tool.</div>Look at Mr. Big man on campus bossing the little kiddies around Save it big man, it's just a football message board.</div>So you're a pussy and not a man of your word. Got it pussy.
