Stats Predictions

PassingJason Campbell - 3154 yds, 27 td, 16 intAntwaan Randle El - 82 yds, 1 td, 0 intRushingClinton Portis - 1249 yds, 12 td, 4.9 avgLadell Betts - 1013 yds, 5 td, 5.2 avgJason Campbell - 256 yds, 1 td, 6.7 avgRecevingSantana Moss - 76 rec, 1279 yds, 7 tdChris Cooley - 66 rec, 865 yds, 8 tdBrandon Lloyd - 36 rec, 643 yds, 2 tdAntwaan Randle El - 41 rec, 512 yds, 4 tdMike Sellers - 15 rec, 74 yds, 5 tdLadell Betts - 49 yds, 359 yds, 1 tdTacklesSean Taylor - 113 tklLondon Fletcher - 109 tklMarcus Washington - 103 tklLaRon Landry 87 tklLemar Marshall - 76 tklSacksAndre Carter - 9 sacksPhillip Daniels - 4 sacksCornelius Griffin - 3.5 sacksLaRon Landry - 3 sacksDemetric Evans - 2.5 sacksInterceptionsFred Smoot - 6 intLaRon Landry - 3 intCarlos Rogers - 3 intSean Taylor - 3 int

 

Care to explain how you will have 600 more yards in receptions then you will passing?

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (AdropOFvenom @ May 8 2007, 09:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Care to explain how you will have 600 more yards in receptions then you will passing?</div>I don't know... he'll get sacked for like 200 yards, Portis will throw, Cooley might throw, and Brunell/Collins will come in and throw like 200-300 yards because of injury or Campbell resting for playoffs (let's hope it's the second one).

 

At least you have high expectations?

 

And sacks don't count as lost yards, this isn't the NCAA :thumbsup:

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brooksie5 @ May 9 2007, 12:34 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>At least you have high expectations?</div>lol I don't have high expectations at all... Why do you all post in here anyways?

 

To make fun of your silly antics about how the Redskins are good.

 

Example?

 

Campbell for 27 TDs is an example...Considering only 2 QBs in the entire league had more than 27 TDs last season... yeah, Campbell and 27 isn't happening.Another example... Santana Moss besting all receivers from last season except 6.how you think Fred Smoot will have 6 INTs... when only 7 CBs in the league last year had 6 or more and they are elite/top 10 CBS like Bailey, Samuel, Mathis, Asomugha, Woodson, McAlister, Harris, Sheppard

 

Your your AP Statistics math, and include the presence of Portis, and Campbell will get 27 TDs.Santana Moss was #2 in 2005 with us. You know how "inconsistent" he is? One good year, one bad year, on good year, one bad year? Well, this year he's due for a good year.You don't have to be good to get 6 INTs. Lemar Marshall got 4 in 2005.

 

4 is not 6.campbell will not get 27. if campbell gets 27TD passes, i will change my name to CampellIsGod.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Punisher @ May 9 2007, 06:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Santana Moss was #2 in 2005 with us. You know how "inconsistent" he is? One good year, one bad year, on good year, one bad year? Well, this year he's due for a good year.</div>Haha, Sideline Santana is good whenever his Hamstring is healthy. Problem is it's rarely healthy.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (iknobaer @ May 9 2007, 10:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>4 is not 6.campbell will not get 27. if campbell gets 27TD passes, i will change my name to CampellIsGod.</div>And I'll change mine to CampellIsJesus. Hell, I'll do that if he gets 25 TDs.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (chang @ May 9 2007, 06:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Campbell for 27 TDs is an example...Considering only 2 QBs in the entire league had more than 27 TDs last season... yeah, Campbell and 27 isn't happening.Another example... Santana Moss besting all receivers from last season except 6.how you think Fred Smoot will have 6 INTs... when only 7 CBs in the league last year had 6 or more and they are elite/top 10 CBS like Bailey, Samuel, Mathis, Asomugha, Woodson, McAlister, Harris, Sheppard</div>Revis is supposedly a lot like Woodson. I like that idea.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brooksie5 @ May 10 2007, 12:24 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (iknobaer @ May 9 2007, 10:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>4 is not 6.campbell will not get 27. if campbell gets 27TD passes, i will change my name to CampellIsGod.</div>And I'll change mine to CampellIsJesus. Hell, I'll do that if he gets 25 TDs.</div>Watch what you two say... Going back to last year's stats Campbell would've had 22.85 TDs had he started all 16 games. And since he improved (like every young QB), and got Portis back, I don't see how he can't have 4 TDs more than he did last year.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Punisher @ May 10 2007, 12:34 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brooksie5 @ May 10 2007, 12:24 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (iknobaer @ May 9 2007, 10:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>4 is not 6.campbell will not get 27. if campbell gets 27TD passes, i will change my name to CampellIsGod.</div>And I'll change mine to CampellIsJesus. Hell, I'll do that if he gets 25 TDs.</div>Watch what you two say... Going back to last year's stats Campbell would've had 22.85 TDs had he started all 16 games. And since he improved (like every young QB), and got Portis back, I don't see how he can't have 4 TDs more than he did last year.</div>Getting Portis back is one of the main reasons why he won't. LaDell Betts couldn't put the ball in the endzone (As shown by his 4 touchdowns in 245 carries) so Campbell had to throw the ball in. Portis on the other hand will run the ball into the endzone (As shown by his 7 Touchdowns last year and 11 in 2005), taking those TD's away from Campbell.

 

Portis gets long TDs, not goal line (we have very weak run blockers on the goal line). He will pound the ball to the goal line, where we will pull our usual play actions to Cooley or Sellers.

 

I like how because Campbell was on target had he started the entire season to throw 22 or so means that he would have. That's saying he is consistant every single week of the season with no off games. Pretty risky call there.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brooksie5 @ May 9 2007, 08:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (iknobaer @ May 9 2007, 10:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>4 is not 6.campbell will not get 27. if campbell gets 27TD passes, i will change my name to CampellIsGod.</div>And I'll change mine to CampellIsJesus. Hell, I'll do that if he gets 25 TDs.</div>I will change my name to...IAmGoingToKillMyselfBecauseThereIsNothingLeftToLiveForSinceJasonCampbellHas
BroughtTheApocolypseByThrowing27TouchdownsForTheRedskinsI simply don't get how you can say that Jason Campbell is a step below Peyton Manning and Carson Palmer. It's like saying I'm only a few dollars away from overtaking Bill Gates.And Fred "I Can't Stay On My Feet and If I Do, I'll Lose My Man or Miss the Tackle Anyway" Smoot doesn't have a shot at 6 INTs. He's going to get double-moved by every wide receiver and give up a TD every game before he gets 6 INTs.

 

Eli Manning threw for 24 TDs... come on. You don't have to be great to do that.Fred Smoot will give up big plays (so he will fit in with our defense ) but will get 4-6 INTs.