OT: K-Mart most overpaid

Discussion in 'Brooklyn Nets' started by Dark Defender, Aug 31, 2007.

  1. Real

    Real Dumb and Dumbest

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2007
    Messages:
    2,858
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga)</div><div class='quotemain'>Travis Best was truely a disservice to the number 6</div>

    It is just a number</p></div>

    I have to disagree with that. A number is part of a player's identity. For four years he was identified with the #6 while he was playing here in the best years of his NBA career, so I'd say there is some sentimentality with that. </p>
     
  2. cpawfan

    cpawfan Monsters do exist

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2007
    Messages:
    8,703
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Real)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga)</div><div class='quotemain'>Travis Best was truely a disservice to the number 6</div>

    It is just a number</p></div>

    I have to disagree with that. A number is part of a player's identity. For four years he was identified with the #6 while he was playing here in the best years of his NBA career, so I'd say there is some sentimentality with that. </p></div>

    Once a player is no longer on a team, it makes no difference to me who wears it next. I'd have no problem with a player on the Pirates wearing 21 or a player on the Penguins wearing 66 and those guys are all time greats </p>

    </p>
     
  3. SportsTicker

    SportsTicker News Feed

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2003
    Messages:
    6,105
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Omniscence is its own punishment, I guess.
     

Share This Page