Knicks to make run at Kobe

Discussion in 'Cleveland Cavaliers' started by Petey, Sep 3, 2007.

  1. Petey

    Petey Super Sized Sexy, The Bulls Fan Killer! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2007
    Messages:
    4,042
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>With coach Phil Jackson entering the final year of his contract, transition appears to be in the Lakers' future. The betting is the Knicks will make a major run at Kobe Bryant with the Bulls, Bryant's personal choice, still a possibility. -- Chicago Tribune</div></p>

    Don't see for what type of package... Lee? Curry or Zach? Balkman?</p>

    -Petey</p>
     
  2. GArenas

    GArenas Wiz Fo Champz

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Messages:
    4,199
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    The Lakers have shown no signs of trading Kobe, I don't think that Kupchak will even listen to what Thomas has to say. Kobe Bryant will be at the Lakers training camp in October.
     
  3. TucsonClip

    TucsonClip Thursday Night in Tucson = Upset

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2007
    Messages:
    927
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Bowling Green, OH
    I dotn even know who they would want from the Knicks. I think it would have to be a 3 way, but who would they even take from NY? If they trade Kobe I doubt they trade Bynum, so would they even take Curry or Randolph?</p>
     
  4. Ruudvannisteroy10

    Ruudvannisteroy10 DYC Soccer God

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    Messages:
    160
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    marbury? doesnt richardson still play for them. theres plenty man
     
  5. Real

    Real Dumb and Dumbest

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2007
    Messages:
    2,858
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ruudvannisteroy10)</div><div class='quotemain'>marbury? doesnt richardson still play for them. theres plenty man</div>

    If I werean NBA team trading with theKnicks,the only players thatappeal to me areBalkman, Collins, and Lee.</p>
     
  6. GArenas

    GArenas Wiz Fo Champz

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Messages:
    4,199
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ruudvannisteroy10)</div><div class='quotemain'>marbury? doesnt richardson still play for them. theres plenty man</div></p>

    </p>

    Please tell me you don't actually believe that Stephon 'I want to play in Italy' Marbury and Quentin Richardson are enough to get the best player in the NBA from a franchise whose fans have supported him for 10+ years. The Knicks simply don't have the pieces and it's completely insane to think that the Knicks can get Kobe without giving up Lee and Curry. </p>

    </p>
     
  7. Arrpy

    Arrpy Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Messages:
    890
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Kobe isn't going anywhere.</p>

    There will be lots of rumors, but he's staying with the Lakers.</p>
     
  8. TheBeef

    TheBeef Commish of FUN!

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2003
    Messages:
    5,495
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Lee would be the 1st guy id ask for....Lee + a large package is a good start....
     
  9. Real

    Real Dumb and Dumbest

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2007
    Messages:
    2,858
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    He sure as hell isn't going to the Knicks. </p>

    Unless the Lakers are truly fucking idiots.</p>
     
  10. Dre

    Dre At least we're friends.

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2005
    Messages:
    426
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    The Lakers aren't gonna want anything from NY because of the guys' reputations, but realistically it's their best shot at getting good value.
     
  11. Real

    Real Dumb and Dumbest

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2007
    Messages:
    2,858
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Dre)</div><div class='quotemain'>The Lakers aren't gonna want anything from NY because of the guys' reputations, but realistically it's their best shot at getting good value.</div> </p>

    I would trade with the Bulls.</p>

    They'd have more to offer than the Knicks.</p>
     
  12. Premier

    Premier Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2007
    Messages:
    509
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    The Bulls don't have the salary to match. Really, New York is the only destination if the Lakers were to trade Kobe.
     
  13. BuLLzDoMaIn

    BuLLzDoMaIn BBW Elite Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2006
    Messages:
    2,011
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Knicks aint going to get kobe. They think cause they have big contracts they can get anyone they want... everytime theres a big named player out there knicks are rumored to get them. whatever
     
  14. zєяσ

    zєяσ Truth is beautiful

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Messages:
    2,222
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Dont see it hapening unless its a 3 team deal.</p>

    </p>

    </p>

    Lol, but check this out:</p>

    http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=9~662~3023~981~110~1998~1031~3002&teams=13~13~13~2~2~2~2~2&te=&cash=2:13</p>

    </p>

    </p>
     
  15. pegs

    pegs My future wife.

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,079
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BuLLzDoMaIn)</div><div class='quotemain'>Knicks aint going to get kobe. They think cause they have big contracts they can get anyone they want... everytime theres a big named player out there knicks are rumored to get them. whatever</div>

    </p> yeah, i agree with you, i've noticed that, too. vince, JO, Garnett, Kobe...it's a little annoying.
     
  16. Dre

    Dre At least we're friends.

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2005
    Messages:
    426
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Well it's New York.
     

Share This Page