Rodman vs. Wallace

Discussion in 'NBA General' started by Mamba, Jun 22, 2003.

  1. GatorsowntheNCAA

    GatorsowntheNCAA Omaha Bound 2010!

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2003
    Messages:
    9,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    ^^ i think rodman was better currently, but ben is blossoming into a star and i think he will continue to improve every year.
     
  2. Shapecity

    Shapecity S2/JBB Teamster Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2003
    Messages:
    45,018
    Likes Received:
    57
    Trophy Points:
    48
    <div class="quote_poster">Quoting "olskoolFunktitude":</div><div class="quote_post"><div class="quote_poster">Quoting "shapecity":</div><div class="quote_post">rodman was better, but i would rather have big ben because rodman is a cancer to team chemistry.</div>

    doesnt matter when youre that good. hes a freak but he cant be THAT bad for team chemistry. he played well with others and didnt make them worse toher wise he wouldnt have won all those championships</div>

    put big ben on any of those championship teams and he would have just as many rings without all the drama rodman brings to a team. don't get me wrong i like rodman a lot and have actually partied with him. he's a kool kat, but he needs a lot babysitting and attention. if he doesn't respect you forget about it, and i think that attitude is not acceptable on a team.
     
  3. GatorsowntheNCAA

    GatorsowntheNCAA Omaha Bound 2010!

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2003
    Messages:
    9,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class="quote_poster">Quoting "shapecity":</div><div class="quote_post"><div class="quote_poster">Quoting "olskoolFunktitude":</div><div class="quote_post"><div class="quote_poster">Quoting "shapecity":</div><div class="quote_post">rodman was better, but i would rather have big ben because rodman is a cancer to team chemistry.</div>

    doesnt matter when youre that good. hes a freak but he cant be THAT bad for team chemistry. he played well with others and didnt make them worse toher wise he wouldnt have won all those championships</div>

    put big ben on any of those championship teams and he would have just as many rings without all the drama rodman brings to a team. don't get me wrong i like rodman a lot and have actually partied with him. he's a kool kat, but he needs a lot babysitting and attention. if he doesn't respect you forget about it, and i think that attitude is not acceptable on a team.</div>

    u partied with rodman? damn that musta been a crazy party.
     
  4. mike18946

    mike18946 JBB

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2003
    Messages:
    11,111
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class="quote_poster">Quoting "olskoolFunktitude":</div><div class="quote_post"><div class="quote_poster">Quoting "shapecity":</div><div class="quote_post">rodman was better, but i would rather have big ben because rodman is a cancer to team chemistry.</div>

    doesnt matter when youre that good. hes a freak but he cant be THAT bad for team chemistry. he played well with others and didnt make them worse toher wise he wouldnt have won all those championships</div>

    Helps when you have the greatest player ever on your team to get you those titles..
     
  5. Sasha

    Sasha ...since the beginning.

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2003
    Messages:
    3,950
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Shit, you had some fun then man.
     
  6. Shapecity

    Shapecity S2/JBB Teamster Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2003
    Messages:
    45,018
    Likes Received:
    57
    Trophy Points:
    48
    yeah both parties were crazy, but as much as he parties he's a light weight at drinking. people take advantage of his money and generosity though, too many fake people in los angeles.
     
  7. sunsfan1357

    sunsfan1357 JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2003
    Messages:
    2,276
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    I'd take Rodman. Does mostly, if not, everything Big Ben does and is a better one-on-one defender.
     
  8. hapnnsas

    hapnnsas JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2003
    Messages:
    260
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Rodman not only had better stats but he put fear into the other team... Sure Wallace might scare them to go down the lane but Rodman scared em so they didnt wanna guard him or go against him
     
  9. Stockton

    Stockton JBB

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2003
    Messages:
    3,648
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Rodman was way better, he put fear into his opponent and they weren't going to fight back(Big Ben does but not as much). He is also a great rebounder, like Ben, and he is a far better on offense.
     
  10. magicfrankie

    magicfrankie JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2003
    Messages:
    736
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    true... one of Rodman?s qualities was that he was able to get into his opponents heads... scaring them before they even played against him...
     
  11. slamduncan21

    slamduncan21 JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2003
    Messages:
    3,274
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Rodman all the way. All he needed was a coach who didn't let him walk all over him. Rodman rebounds better than Wallace.. had more offense than Wallace and had the ability to make free throws towards the end of the game when it mattered.
     

Share This Page