Marshall Faulk. THeLakerShow it would wise not to take Vick as there are alot of good QB depth in a FF Draft while the RB draft is not as great.
<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">Marshall Faulk. THeLakerShow it would wise not to take Vick as there are alot of good QB depth in a FF Draft while the RB draft is not as great.</div> actually a running QB is what you need... since in most fantasy leagues running 10(or 20) is equal to throwing 25(or 50) yrds... so having the best running QB is a good idea... Id take Holmes... then Vick... then Owens since their is hardley any WRs that put up good numbers each weeks...
i think i would choose between the top 4 rb's in my top 4 picks(tomlinson, holmes, ricky williams, marshall faulk), then get some qb's(mcnabb, vick, culpepper, manning, etc.), then get some recievers in later rounds, because there are more quality wr's then rb.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting purehoops:</div><div class="quote_post">actually a running QB is what you need... since in most fantasy leagues running 10(or 20) is equal to throwing 25(or 50) yrds... so having the best running QB is a good idea... Id take Holmes... then Vick... then Owens since their is hardley any WRs that put up good numbers each weeks...</div> A running QB is always a great thing however you cant really pass on the elite RBs/WR's to get a top notch QB. Basically your draft board is based on the scoring system and your league requirements.
<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">And that means that in most leagues that QB's and RB's get the most points</div> Cap'n obvious strikes again...!
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting J-MAC:</div><div class="quote_post">And that means that in most leagues that QB's and RB's get the most points</div> Dont take this the wrong way but, NO **** SHIRLOCK :mrgreen: