<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">All of those guards are better than Gilchrist in the four major point guard statistics (points, assists, rebounds, steals)</div> You forgot assist to turnover ratio, possibly the most important statistic of all for point guards.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting sunsfan1357:</div><div class="quote_post">You forgot assist to turnover ratio, possibly the most important statistic of all for point guards.</div>It wouldn't have made much of a difference. You can get my point by looking at the four stats I provided. Besides, the first source I used to get these stats didn't have assist/turnover ratios.
A/T ratio is probably the best indicator of a point guard - but there are so many factors that you can't use just one. Felton, Jack, and Duhon are all clearly better than Gilchrist. I think Chris Paul at Wake will also be ahead of him (just personal conjecture). Maybe Todd Galloway too...maybe. And if Billet counts as a PG, he's ahead of Gilchrist too. Don't get me wrong, Gilchrist is a nice player. But he's not the most physically gifted, and he's got to prove what he can do now that his supporting cast is gone. Let's see what he can do with Caner-Medley and Garrison and Co.
