Fine...2002 then... You really need to stop saying this asterisk rubbish..seriously..It just makes you look bad.If Spurs have a so-called "asterisk" next to their name..So should the Lakers Don't know why you have heat with S.A...The fact these two teams are the only ones to win a title in the last 5 years should mean something.....
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting anadagirlballer4strt:</div><div class="quote_post">lol y are u putting asteriks on Spurs? weird... </div> I think It's between bitterness and being very immature...It's like me calling the Lakers.. fakers or lamers in every thread...It is childish..
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting allnet:</div><div class="quote_post">I think It's between bitterness and being very immature....</div> I don't have much bitterness towards the Sp**s, as I knew the Lakers dynasty would come to an end sometime. But guess what? There is a whole nother dynasty starting up now with GP and the Mailman on our side.
Laker fans are the worst...and that is a fact! I mean what do u mean astericked titles for SA?...seriously LA fans feel there team is so superior and their mentality is "we can win with injured teams and not have an asterick but SA and other teams cant."...I mean come on thats childish man , if u wanna put astericks next to teams who have won titles with injured teams then check this out: 2000-Duncan out (best player in our team) 2001-Anderson out (2nd leading scorer) 2002-Robinson out (arguably our best defender) i mean its cool , keep on saying SA has astericks next to their titles just dont forget that LA won their titles with injuries also...and if u wanna say something about 99 being a lockout season and all that trash I tough id let u know that that is also not a legit reason for SA deserving an asterick next to their 99' title... Sure the season wasnt as long or grueling as an 82 game season , but that still wasnt an advantage for SA.All the other teams played the same amount of games and had as good of a chance to win it as did SA...and may I add that the Spurs still won the same amount of playoff games as any other champion (except 2003 spurs)...as a matter of fact they had one of the best playoff records ever , going 15-2.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting 9SA21SPURS20:</div><div class="quote_post">Laker fans are the worst...and that is a fact! I mean what do u mean astericked titles for SA?...seriously LA fans feel there team is so superior and their mentality is "we can win with injured teams and not have an asterick but SA and other teams cant."...I mean come on thats childish man , if u wanna put astericks next to teams who have won titles with injured teams then check this out: 2000-Duncan out (best player in our team) 2001-Anderson out (2nd leading scorer) 2002-Robinson out (arguably our best defender) i mean its cool , keep on saying SA has astericks next to their titles just dont forget that LA won their titles with injuries also...and if u wanna say something about 99 being a lockout season and all that trash I tough id let u know that that is also not a legit reason for SA deserving an asterick next to their 99' title... Sure the season wasnt as long or grueling as an 82 game season , but that still wasnt an advantage for SA.All the other teams played the same amount of games and had as good of a chance to win it as did SA...and may I add that the Spurs still won the same amount of playoff games as any other champion (except 2003 spurs)...as a matter of fact they had one of the best playoff records ever , going 15-2.</div> first of all man learn how to spell next laker fans are not the worst so what if we like to talk about how good they are and that is because they are good. i give respect to the spurs but really i dont think they could win with both duncan and robinson on the court at the same time.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Baller08:</div><div class="quote_post">i give respect to the spurs but really i dont think they could win with both duncan and robinson on the court at the same time.</div>Didn't they do it last year?
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Baller08:</div><div class="quote_post">give respect to the spurs but really i dont think they could win with both duncan and robinson on the court at the same time.</div> i can see u dont follow the NBA much...i mean lets be serious man u just showed every1 how little u know about bball. What do u mean they cant win with D-Rob and TD on the floor at the same time ??? Theyre just coming off a championship season where duncan was the starting PF and Robinson the starting C...meaning they were on the court at the same time most of the time. p.s. what do u mean learn how to spell?...i didnt commit one spelling error...LA fans
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting 9SA21SPURS20:</div><div class="quote_post">i can see u dont follow the NBA much...i mean lets be serious man u just showed every1 how little u know about bball. What do u mean they cant win with D-Rob and TD on the floor at the same time ??? Theyre just coming off a championship season where duncan was the starting PF and Robinson the starting C...meaning they were on the court at the same time most of the time. p.s. what do u mean learn how to spell?...i didnt commit one spelling error...LA fans </div> okay man i can see what i said went way over your head but thats okay we all are a little slow sometimes
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Baller08:</div><div class="quote_post">okay man i can see what i said went way over your head but thats okay we all are a little slow sometimes</div>I guess it went over my head to. Can you explain what you meant because it made no sense to me either.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Rudeezy:</div><div class="quote_post">I guess it went over my head to. Can you explain what you meant because it made no sense to me either.</div> what mean is that if they didnt have two centers you mind as well say in the paint they would not have won that champ last year or the time they played the knicks.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Baller08:</div><div class="quote_post">what mean is that if they didnt have two centers you mind as well say in the paint they would not have won that champ last year or the time they played the knicks.</div>
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting King James:</div><div class="quote_post"></div> That hurt my head too. Horrible english. Horrible post.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting the MDE:</div><div class="quote_post">I don't have much bitterness towards the Sp**s, as I knew the Lakers dynasty would come to an end sometime. But guess what? There is a whole nother dynasty starting up now with GP and the Mailman on our side. </div> Lakers may win the title this year..but dynasty with 35 year old Payton,40 year old Malone and 30 something whatever Shaq is? NO.... BTW 9SA21SPURS20 good post...
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting King James:</div><div class="quote_post"></div> never mind man i am not trying to argue with anybody but if you dont get you just dont get it then
