Was Curry for Hunter really beneficial for us?

Discussion in 'Toronto Raptors' started by v_carter15, Apr 21, 2004.

Moderators: 1

Moderators

  1. BigVolcano
Page 2 of 2
  1. nkwu

    nkwu JBB shoehead

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2003
    Messages:
    2,024
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    mad OT: but No I don't believe u Harry_balls
     
    nkwu, Apr 26, 2004
    #21
  2. harry_balls5

    harry_balls5 JBB Banned Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2004
    Messages:
    523
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    <div class="quote_poster">Quoting nkwu:</div><div class="quote_post">mad OT: but No I don't believe u Harry_balls</div>
    thats too unfortunate
     
    harry_balls5, Apr 26, 2004
    #22
  3. deception

    deception JBB Banned Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2004
    Messages:
    4,233
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    38
    watching the detroit, new jersey game last night i came to the same realization as the original poster, the hunter for curry trade was one of grunwald's big mistakes. hunter would have given the raptors the backcourt defense to curtail the likes of starberry. imagine a starting backcourt of hunter, rose and carter in your 3 guard lineup; u have a draw and kick guy, a shooter and a legit offensive star. curry gave the raptors a lot of headlines, the headlines on the gossip page. he brought the antithesis of what a vetern brings, he brought instability.
     
    deception, May 8, 2004
    #23
Page 2 of 2

Share This Page