<div class="quote_poster">Quoting jetlee6509:</div><div class="quote_post">dorell wright is the next kobe not tmac</div> He will be neither, his playing style most resembles a young and healthy Grant Hill and one day he'll probably be one of the best all-around players in the league, hopefully.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting zac5556:</div><div class="quote_post">So it doesnt matter....by the way Dorrell Wright plays you can tell that hes gonna become a great NBA star...you never know hes got a good chance at becoming rookie of the year....</div> HAH! If I knew you, I'd put a grand on that not happening, hell I'd put a grand on Wright never averaging more than 10 points a game.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Phreeze:</div><div class="quote_post">No, it wasn't a dumb comment by vintage. You need to make your posts clearer, because by saying "He's the same height as T-Mac, so watch out for Dorell Wright" means watch out for his height. If you wanted to make two different points in "He's the same height as T-Mac," and "watch out for him" you have to separate them in different sentences. Correction: you got owned.</div> I understood him perfectly. I believe most people would agree with glendaleMVP, you and vintage were the ones who got owned.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Bez Koske:</div><div class="quote_post">How come nobody points out that his team lost by like 30?</div> Scores 30, lost by 30. Shades of T-Mac already.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Einitials:</div><div class="quote_post">I understood him perfectly. I believe most people would agree with Phreeze, you and vintage were the ones who got owned. </div> Why am I not surprised you understood him perfectly.... anyway, the quote is: <div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post"> He's the same height as T-Mac, so watch out for Dorell Wright. </div> He used the conjuction "so." Meaning, since he's the same heigth as T-Mac, watch out for Dorell Wright. "So" implies that there are two statements that are connected together. What he should have used as "and" to seperate the two statements; not connect them. For example, "He's the same heigth as Tmac and also, watch out for Dorrell Wright." Or better yet, don't put them in the same sentence since they are unrelated. The way he did it suggests that we should be watching out for Wright because he is the same heigth as TMac. So no.....Phreeze and I don't get owned. Its not our fault we expect others to be able to use common grammar in their posts.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Vintage:</div><div class="quote_post">Why am I not surprised you understood him perfectly.... anyway, the quote is: He used the conjuction "so." Meaning, since he's the same heigth as T-Mac, watch out for Dorell Wright. "So" implies that there are two statements that are connected together. What he should have used as "and" to seperate the two statements; not connect them. For example, "He's the same heigth as Tmac and also, watch out for Dorrell Wright." Or better yet, don't put them in the same sentence since they are unrelated. The way he did it suggests that we should be watching out for Wright because he is the same heigth as TMac. So no.....Phreeze and I don't get owned. Its not our fault we expect others to be able to use common grammar in their posts.</div> His sentence was indeed grammatically flawed and SLIGHTY ambiguous, however it was not that difficult to interpret the gist of the message. If you took your time and read his post carefully instead of bashing his writing ability, you would have understood the point he was trying to convey. Let me remind you that this is a message board, not a formal paper. As long as the writings are readable it doesn?t matter if they are written poorly. For example you wrote: What he should have used as "and" to seperate the two statements. What you meant to write was? (What he should have used WAS AN "and" to SEPARATE the two statements.) How many people do you see correcting your spellings and grammar errors? Even though this sentence was not PERFECTLY written, it was still good enough to interpret. Glendale was right the first time. You and Phreeze were the ones who got owned.
i feel lyk im in english class. kan u guys juss forget bout it. I mean who kares wat kind of spelling or grammar u use online. im not going to type YOU wen i kan juss type U. kall me lazy if u want kus i am lol.
