Luke Walton to Boston for Marcus Banks?

Discussion in 'Los Angeles Lakers' started by Jesseca328, Sep 18, 2004.

  1. Jesseca328

    Jesseca328 JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    Messages:
    330
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    What in the world is this. I guess we have our final trade Laker Fans. Luke Walton + Deven George for Marcus Banks + Yogi Stewart. Why would you trade Luke, he's a great passer and I see him as great future player. But then we get the quickness of Banks which will come in handy with Parker.

    http://www.hoopsworld.com/article_9673.shtml

    <div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">Inside information out of Boston has indicated that the Lakers and Celtics may be working on another deal once the Celtics have confirmation that Payton is good to go. Marcus Banks and seldom used Yogi Stewart to the Lakers for Luke Walton and Devean George.

    The Lakers would hate to see Walton go, but it amounts to losing your third string small forward for a young point guard who ultimately could grow into the starting role. George is recovering from ankle surgery and will miss at least the first months of the season. He never healed correctly from that spill he took against the San Antonio Spurs back in the 2003 playoffs but should be back to normal once he mends. Although he had some excellent moments in Los Angeles, he hasn't performed up to expectations after the Lakers gave him a nice contract.</div>
     
  2. Mez

    Mez JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2004
    Messages:
    1,440
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Out of all the trades/rumors I've read this summer, I hate this one the most by far.. I've actually gotten over the fact that we don't have Banks, and now there's rumors about bringing him back again? No thanks. There's something about this guy Yogi Stewart that I've always HATED, and I would hate to see him as a Laker.. Although we would aquire a much needed PG, I don't think he's worth both George and Walton..
     
  3. Billa_Bong

    Billa_Bong JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Messages:
    354
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    idk, i mean i really like Luke, but right now we need a good prospect pg, it kind of makes sense you know

    so really as a fan i hate to see this trade go thro, but for the good of the team, it shud prob be done
     
  4. bbwtrench

    bbwtrench BBW Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2004
    Messages:
    5,425
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    38
    WTF. Hate this trade. damn. Guess no big trade after all.
     
  5. notmuchgame

    notmuchgame JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2003
    Messages:
    3,829
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    I would do this deal. If you look at it in last year terms, we'd be trading a second round pick and Deavan George for a 1st round pick and a filler.

    If we are looking at our current roster, we're totally stacked at the wing positions. If we trade Walton and George, that would leave us with (guys who can play the wing) Kobe, Rush, Butler, Odom, Vujacic, and Jones.

    Kobe will play 40+ minutes a game. Lets just assume that Odom will only play powerfoward and Vujacic will only play point guard (which will not be the case), that still only leaves about 56 minutes left to distribute amongst Rush and Butler. If you keep Walton and George in the picture, there will be odd men out. All of them are too good to ride the pine.

    Banks will give the Lakers much needed quickness, and a longterm one at that.
     
  6. 30 standing ver

    30 standing ver JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    3,106
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    ^Ya broke it down. But just looking at the title of the thread the first thing that came to mind was NOOO!!!!!!!!!! nMg always have good points. But I can't see Luke gone from LA. Well actually I guess I could see him in a green uniform like his father. IDK what to really think about this.
     
  7. jbbReal Deal

    jbbReal Deal Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2004
    Messages:
    2,407
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    It's a good trade, but I'd rather have someone with a little more experience than Marcus Banks. We can get a little better out of both Walton and George, because I don't care much for Yogi Stewart (Michael Stewart, just in case anyone is wondering). Come on, Stewart was never drafted, and he's been with the Kings, Raptors, Cavs and Celtics already since 1997. He can't play any offense...all he does is wait for a rebound or an opportunity to block a shot.

    Oh well...I'm thinking the Lakers will just release him once they get him anyways.
     
  8. Smoke

    Smoke JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2003
    Messages:
    1,332
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    well I really dont know what to say about this trade form a lakers standpoint i just see it as a risk.

    but as NMG stated they wood be overloaded so i'm guessing this is really a good move for both teams. I'm also guessing the lakers see some potential in this kid banks or either they are truly desperate for a pg.

    As for the celtics they are really shaping up by taking all of the lakers throw aways. they should be a nice contending team next year. Paul pierce should be delighted to have all these players on his team. Especially if payton plays for Bean town.
     
  9. yanix

    yanix JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Messages:
    544
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    i dont like this trade. Luke Walton proved to be very useful during the last season. why would they trade away someone with so much potential like Luke?
     
  10. Lakerland

    Lakerland JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2004
    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    I like this trade. I mean, Walton has some potential because he's a good passer but he's not very quick, and Banks has even more potential than Walton does. George is decent at best, and the Lakers have way too many SF anyway so...yeah, good trade. <font color="Red">EDIT-cursing </font> He's good but let's face it, he'll never be an all star.
     
  11. Bahir

    Bahir User power factor: ∞

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2003
    Messages:
    1,994
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Neither will Banks. And you dont need a team full of allstars, you need TEAM players, like Walton. By the way, Banks said before that he didnt want to get traded because he has just adjusted to Boston, he has alot of friends there, and most importantly; his son wants to stay
     
  12. Lakerland

    Lakerland JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2004
    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    True but Banks could be a team player...yo never know, players change. Also, one of th emost important things to remember is that the Lakers had too many SF and SOMEONE had to go. You could make an argument for every SF the Lakers had, but I think this is for the best.

    Haha, my post got edited. Guess you'll never know what I said...
     
  13. jbbReal Deal

    jbbReal Deal Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2004
    Messages:
    2,407
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Hmm...how about George and Walton for Banks and Baker? [​IMG] Hehe...if the Celts did that, I'd be dancing. [​IMG]
     
  14. Mez

    Mez JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2004
    Messages:
    1,440
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Who's Baker? If you're talkin about Vin Baker they waived him mid way through last season..
     
  15. purpleb0n9

    purpleb0n9 JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2004
    Messages:
    968
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Man, it sucks Walton can be more than a good role player... his ball IQ is very high... and I wonder, are the contracts of Banks+Stewart even match that of Devean?
     
  16. Moo2K4

    Moo2K4 NBA West Producer

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    11,768
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Alburnett, Iowa
    I'm currently indifferent about this trade. I like Luke and all and wouldn't want to see him go, but on the other hand, we do need a back up point guard soley because I don't want to have to throw Vujacic in there already. This trade would give us that. But, I don't know if I'd want to trade off Luke. We'll have to see what Kupchak and company do over the coming days.
     
  17. jbbReal Deal

    jbbReal Deal Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2004
    Messages:
    2,407
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class="quote_poster">Quoting PupMelo:</div><div class="quote_post">Man, it sucks Walton can be more than a good role player... his ball IQ is very high... and I wonder, are the contracts of Banks+Stewart even match that of Devean?</div>

    http://www.hoopshype.com/salaries.htm

    Haha...I just realized that New York had Vin Baker. I don't know what I was thinking. [​IMG]
     
  18. BigBlueFan

    BigBlueFan BBW Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2004
    Messages:
    2,685
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Why would the Celtics want to get rid of Banks? He is still young and has room to improve his game. If either one of these teams do this trade, they're both crazy.
     
  19. jbbAce

    jbbAce JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2004
    Messages:
    177
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Anyone but Stewart would be an upgrade.
     
  20. kobe-360

    kobe-360 JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2004
    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    So would it help the Lakers?
     

Share This Page