1. its alexander, not alexandra. 2. i know how lethal he is. 3. why do we need him, we already have a great RB... puttin Westbrook at WR would be pointless. as bednarik said, hes 5'9"! thats not good for a WR. 4. were getting Buckhalter back next year. we wont use levens as often.
1. Buckhalter is no were near as good as Alexander 2. Apperently if you are taking buckhalter,westbrook, and levens over him you dont know how lethal he is 3. Easy he adds a bigger threat, Big things come in small pacages. 4. Buckhalter is not as good as Alexander FOR THE LAST TIME!!!!!!!!!
Pat, i know how lethal he is. but why would you lose Westbrook to the WR position? thats not a good thing to do. yes hes a great Reciever.... but hes not someone you should send deep like you would Moss. getting Alexander would be a good thing to do, but as i said, itd be a waste of 2 good RBs who you want to play at WR...
Buckhalter will not be on the Eagles next year, he's a freeagent and I doubt then want him back with all his injuries.
Exactly maybe they wont send westbrook as a reciver maybe we might just go with that 3 headed monster with like a 2 real good headed monster if we do that there would be no stopping us.
So you would rather jeopardize the teams future signing a guy who's made 2 Pro Bowls, already 28 years old, has never had more than 36 cathes in a season (remember Philly runs the West Coast), obviously puts himself before the team (see transcripts of Seattle's last regular season game), and will want to be paid like a leagues best runner even though he isn't? Yes, he's a solid player but why give him the cash when you already have a Pro Bowler in Westbrook? Buck' is as good as gone, so is Levens. I'd be content grabbing a bruiser in the 3rd round and see what happens when final cuts are made before the season opener, similar to how they handled it last year grabbing Levens for dirt cheap. Let the other teams in the league mortgage their future making moves like that, not Philly. If your a Philly fan, you should hope the deal with Trotter happens sooner than later. You want to say Alexander is "leathal"? Fine, he's leathal, I just don't want to see him in a Philly uniform next year. He's not gonna sign a 1 year if that's what your hoping......this is his payday, and I'm sure his agent will find a team that will give him that 6 year deal that he wants......
Wow -- so many different directions here. 1. Mitchell will end up fading out. He reminds me of Alvin Harper a little, but an even bigger mouth. 2. One year is early to tell, but there is little to show that the Julius Jones deal wasn't a good deal....other than the sudden surprise showing of Bledsoe and the Bills this year. 3. The Eagles aren't going to get Alexander, Moss, etc. - Look at the Eagles history. Signing TO and Kearse in one year is the exception to the rule. I think it is more realistic to expect no major signings in the skill positions.
Ok but if thats what you want to think Cowboy you can but i will tell you right now thats exactly what people said about T.O last year.
