I would not say you are as bad as dilberts boss, of course, i have never known him to post blatant fallacies, and then defend them as if they were true. You seemed for a while to at least have some legitimacy to your posts. You were slightly consistent. You thought certain players were good(all eagles) and certain players were bad(any non-eagles) Now though, when presented with facts you will contradict one thing to make a post countering my point in one thread, and then make the opposite post to counter someone else post in another thread. What happened to you E4L, have you lost sight of the point of having a discussion forum? It is not here so you can attack my every post. Each thread is not isolated completely from the others. If you make a point in one thread and come back 2 weeks later in another thread and say you never said what was in the first thread, and then contradict that point completely you will be called out for it. You will be laughed at by all the people of the forums for your ignorance. I am sorry that you continue to do this, and i have to continue to put you in your place. Maybe you should take notes, and then you will remember what you believe, instead of just shooting off at the keyboard
Now, let us get back on topic, testeverde, and bledsoe, and some kreig. HOFer's? We know our opinions (except for E4L, his may change in 2 weeks, and he will say he never said testeverde wasnt a HOFer) What is your opinion?
If Testeverde were in another offense he would have done much better. he was stuck in Tampa n that brought him down, and he still put up Awesome passing #s.
So now were are bashing a man for having convictions? regardless of what they are, your convictions are about the only thing that matters in the world when its all said and done....if you cant understand that, then i know you're a flaming liberal....to the topic at hand, I took the QB that you think the most of in the current NFL, D. McNabb, the guy that is most likely to get your support for the hall of fame....I showed how many seasons McNabb would have to put together to reach the yardage totals of Testeverde....did I do this to directly compare the 2 players in hopes of demonstrating that one was superior? Nope, I did it to put the yardage number into perspective....44475, think about that number and the players that have acheived more and the players that have achieved less....think about how long todays players have to maintain success to get to that total, even in this "chuck and duck" era of football....that total is amazing no matter how you got it....
