I would do it. you just get more TO and worse FG% while the rest of the categories are improved, BUT if you dont have any bad players that you would drop, then dont do it but if you have 2 more slots to be filled then do it.
You are losing a triple-double threat in Wade, but McGrady can give you forty points on any given night. I consider it a fair trade, for the future. Right now I would much rather have Wade the McGrady, but T-Mac will be back to his old self later in the season. I would speculate for awhile, but in the end accept it.
Dont do it, why would you give up Wade who is avergaing almost a double double and Miller who can score 20 any given night and contribute for T-Mac who is a great scorer, but Bell is nothing. Your gettin rid of two good shooters for one back. And T-mac is struggling this year.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting i3crossover:</div><div class="quote_post">Dont do it, why would you give up Wade who is avergaing almost a double double and Miller who can score 20 any given night and contribute for T-Mac who is a great scorer, but Bell is nothing. Your gettin rid of two good shooters for one back. And T-mac is struggling this year.</div> i totally agree.. i've got wade and reggie in my money league. though reggie's and wade's games are kinda limited.. i wouldn't give em up for just tmac.. even though wade's lines aren't very flashy, the 20+ pts and 8+ assists are always there.. and reggie. he's kinda a headache, but he's got the ability to give you those big big games.. i'd keep wade and miller based on.. bell sux and your only getting tmac for two players that could break out any night, or jus give you a clean semi-consistent line..
