give me your playoff lineups

Discussion in 'Sacramento Kings' started by harbingerofdoom, Mar 12, 2005.

  1. harbingerofdoom

    harbingerofdoom JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2004
    Messages:
    1,147
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Yes, its a tad early, but hey... this is just for fun here...

    Miller is expected to be back by then, so we shall include him for now.
    Jackson is expected to not be back untill after the playoffs start & has basicly been out for the better part of two years, you can include him, but keep that in mind.
    Please give me starting lineups, and substitutions in order by position. Feel free to include players that can play multiple positions in your order (example of that being Bibby, House, Martin as the sub order)


    as things stand this is how I have it

    Starting Lineup (which is no surprise)

    1- Bibby
    2- Mobley
    3- Stojakovic
    4- Thomas
    5- Miller

    Substitutions:
    1- Bibby, House, Jackson, Martin
    2- Mobley, Evans, Martin
    3- Stojakovic, Williamson, Evans
    4- Thomas, Williamson, Skinner, Miller
    5- Miller, Skinner, Ostertag, Thomas

    Small lineup:
    1 Bibby/house
    2 Mobley/Evans
    3 Stojakovic/Williamson
    4 Thomas
    5 Skinner

    Big lineup
    1 Bibby/Mobley
    2 Evans
    3 Williamson/Stojakovic
    4 Skinner/Miller
    5 Miller/Ostertag

    Defensive Lineup: (as in we need a shot blocked a steal or a defensive rebound)
    1 Bibby
    2 Evans
    3 Williamson
    4 Miller
    5 Skinner

    Offensive Linup (as in we need a last second shot from someone)
    1 Bibby
    2 Mobley
    3 Stojakovic
    4 Thomas
    5 Miller

    Garbage time linuep:
    1 House
    2 Martin
    3 Williamson
    4 Skinner
    5 Tag


    One thing that I found was when I started looking at the players that I believe will get minutes in the playoffs (even though Adelman tends to have a limited playoff roster) I could not really think of a way of not having every one of these guys listed in here.
    a few notes on my lineup:
    *The 1 and 2 are at times interchangable and really, any of the 2's listed here could play at the 1 if they needed to.
    *I have Miller listed at the 4 because he knows the position very well and he & Skinner Could easily rotate between the two positions at any point they are on the floor together.
     
  2. sactomofo

    sactomofo BBW Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2004
    Messages:
    432
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Starting Line

    1 - Bibby
    2 - Mobley
    3 - Peja
    4 - Darius
    5 - Miller

    Subs
    Bibby, Jackson, House, Mobley (if he needs to play 1)
    Mobley, Evans, Martin, House
    Stojakovic, Williamson, Martin
    Songalia, Thomas, Williamson, Miller (if you use Skinner at 5)
    Miller, Skinner, Ostertag
     
  3. harbingerofdoom

    harbingerofdoom JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2004
    Messages:
    1,147
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class="quote_poster">Quoting sactomofo:</div><div class="quote_post">Starting Line

    1 - Bibby
    2 - Mobley
    3 - Peja
    4 - Darius
    5 - Miller

    Subs
    Bibby, Jackson, House, Mobley (if he needs to play 1)
    Mobley, Evans, Martin, House
    Stojakovic, Williamson, Martin
    Songalia, Thomas, Williamson, Miller (if you use Skinner at 5)
    Miller, Skinner, Ostertag</div>
    im only asking out of curiosity here...
    why do you have Jackson coming in off the bench before house?
     
  4. sactomofo

    sactomofo BBW Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2004
    Messages:
    432
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Eddie House over Bobby Jackson? Even if Jackson is comming off a major injury, he still makes most of his plays with his legs. Jackson has been in the playoffs before and most of all, has the most experience on the entire team at running the offense. I would take 63% of Jackson over House in the playoffs because Jackson is used to the intense pressure.
     
  5. harbingerofdoom

    harbingerofdoom JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2004
    Messages:
    1,147
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    I still wouldnt play Jackson over House under this particular situation if only for the fact that after that long a period of time, Jackson would be pretty rusty while House has been playing great behind Bibby (not as good as Jackson has in the past, but there is no way that Jackson can take that amount of time off and still be effective right out of the gate).
    that was my only reasoning behind it.
     
  6. sactomofo

    sactomofo BBW Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2004
    Messages:
    432
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    I could see that. I guess that it would all depend on how Jackson has been looking in practice before Rick would make his decision. I hope that the Kings can somehow get the 4 spot by the end of the year.
     
  7. 44Thrilla

    44Thrilla cuatro cuatro

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2004
    Messages:
    14,113
    Likes Received:
    216
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Somehow I agree with both of you. If the decision were mine, I'd probably use House over Jackson. But, I don't think Adelman would agree with me. Coaches are notorious when it comes to situations like this. Rick won't let Jackson lose his spot because of an injury. The only way House will take it over is if Bobby plays him self out of it.
     
  8. sactomofo

    sactomofo BBW Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2004
    Messages:
    432
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    <div class="quote_poster">Quoting 44Thrilla:</div><div class="quote_post">Somehow I agree with both of you. If the decision were mine, I'd probably use House over Jackson. But, I don't think Adelman would agree with me. Coaches are notorious when it comes to situations like this. Rick won't let Jackson lose his spot because of an injury. The only way House will take it over is if Bobby plays him self out of it.</div>

    Look at how Rick hurt the team by his willingness to stick with Webber. With Jackson being a free agent at the end of the year (although there is a club option for next year) I would be willing to bet that management would do what ever they can to make BJax as happy as possible.
     
  9. harbingerofdoom

    harbingerofdoom JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2004
    Messages:
    1,147
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class="quote_poster">Quoting sactomofo:</div><div class="quote_post">Look at how Rick hurt the team by his willingness to stick with Webber. With Jackson being a free agent at the end of the year (although there is a club option for next year) I would be willing to bet that management would do what ever they can to make BJax as happy as possible.</div>
    Jackson is signed through next year.. The Kings hold the option and they have already notified him that they intend to exercise their option on his contract.

    As for the Webber situation, that was a slightly different issue with a starting player vs a bench player along with the fact that Webbers "feelings" might get hurt. It was not the greatest of moves on Adelmans part, but I dont see the same thing happening in this situation.

    As far as Jackson playing himself out of it? I really think that he will not even be able to play himself INTO it at this point. He has esentially missed the last two seasons & I dont think he can be ready in that short a time frame. He may get some minutes on the floor, but I dont really see it being a lot of minutes that will make much of a difference this year.
     

Share This Page