Because I don't want this out yet, I will give you a brief update on our product research. The medical journal study result is as summarized: The reason why I am so stealth with this publication is we haven't passed it through our attorneys yet. I want to make sure we can release the study like we have with the other 10 medical research.
Dang I would think some of you would love this science. I thought Further was in the cancer research field?
Cell phones cause Leukemia, and by weakening/destroying the immune system cause a myriad of diseases, deficiencies and death. But this has been common knowledge for years. Since your OP's important parts are all abbreviated I have to guess this is what you are hinting at?
I've been out to lunch, just checked in. I've dealt with apoptosis in the past, I would like for you to PM me what you have. I will say that there is no shortage of caspase 3 inhibitors, the problem comes in that generally speaking, that's not very specific, so basically, it would cause apoptosis in most cell types, not just cancerous ones. But, that's just a very general thought, I would love to see the specifics.
If anyone wants a visual overview of apoptosis (programed cell death) here is a good link. Click on the first square, top left. http://www.cellsignal.com/pathways/apoptosis-signaling.jsp From there you can see where capase 3 comes into play.
I love scientific research, but biology details are WAY over my head. I recall you explaining your biofuel reactor IRL and I was struggling to keep up with most of the concepts. I'm a math and physics guy.
In a simple understanding, cancer usually promotes more growth in a unhealthy environment. Oxidative stress is a big problem. Overloads of lactic acid is a measurement of oxidative stress. Anything you ingest that reduces oxidative stress can help with controlling cancer.
For example, Eastoff, when I was in China I ate nothing but raw vegetables because it reduces oxidative stress. So much cabbage and brussel sprouts ....yuck
Looks like pre-clinical data, which could be a step in the right direction, but I've seen plenty of rockstar preclinical data that dive bombed when the drug went into the clinic. Not to be a scrooge, but it's brutally tough to develop drugs that become commercially successful. Given that it's gone to a journal, I'm guessing your IP rights are fine with disclosing here, but you could really piss off the journal by scooping them (even here in S2, believe it or not.)
That's why I am not releasing the link. Don't get me wrong brother... I know it is far from being a definite. Although, the last thing we want is for this to be considered a drug. We like being a "nutritional supplement" much better. Less regulations, less red tape, and opportunities for anyone to get it at an affordable rate. In Europe, they are trying hard to get it approved as some sort of alternative treatment. We don't want that in America
I just did a quick read, which isn't to say much since something like this usually takes a long methodical read to fully understand, but it seems like very interesting work. Although very interesting, there are still so many road blocks to it being a viable treatment. But this is how we move forward, so congrats Mags, and congrats to the team working on it.
Sorry, didn't mean to be so pessimistic. Anything that could cure, treat or prevent cancer is a good thing and worth exploring. Anyone who is trying to cure, treat or prevent cancer is good in my book.
