82 Game +/- Statistics

Discussion in 'Golden State Warriors' started by jayserinos99, Feb 23, 2004.

  1. jayserinos99

    jayserinos99 JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    149
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
  2. Rudeezy

    Rudeezy JBB Senior *********

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    Messages:
    6,037
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Very cool. Thats Jay.[​IMG]
     
  3. Custodianrules2

    Custodianrules2 Cohan + Rowell = Suck

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    11,741
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I knew Cardinal would own the rest of the Warriors in terms of production. And look who is last, my good friend Dunleavy.
     
  4. coolhandluke

    coolhandluke JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2004
    Messages:
    342
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Cool site, I have to check it out every now and then.
     
  5. Custodianrules2

    Custodianrules2 Cohan + Rowell = Suck

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    11,741
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Min = the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was on the floor.
    Net = net points (+/-) for the team while the player was on the floor.

    Player Min(%) Net (+/-)
    Cardinal 45% +161
    Claxton 53% +75
    Cheaney 54% +51
    Pietrus 7% +33
    Lampley 2% +20
    Langhi 0% +5
    Jones 0% -11
    Parks 2% -18
    Robinson 70% -27
    Johnson 12% -31
    Richardson 71% -35
    Foyle 5% -37
    Murphy 8% -46
    Dampier 66% -76
    Van Exel 43% -120
    Dunleavy 55% -139
     
  6. Trip

    Trip 2000000000000000000000000

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2003
    Messages:
    8,773
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    London/Mississauga, ON
    I don't think this is accurate. I've noticed that bench players get high on the list, because they have nothing to lose while playing anyways. Nope, I don't support efficiency theories.
     
  7. Custodianrules2

    Custodianrules2 Cohan + Rowell = Suck

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    11,741
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class="quote_poster">Quoting Trip:</div><div class="quote_post">I don't think this is accurate. I've noticed that bench players get high on the list, because they have nothing to lose while playing anyways. Nope, I don't support efficiency theories.</div>

    True, I wasn't really serious.
     
  8. Warriorfansnc93

    Warriorfansnc93 JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2004
    Messages:
    2,993
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    New starting 5

    CardinalPF
    Claxton PG
    Cheaney SG
    Pietrus SF
    Jones C

    Oh yeah!
     
  9. Custodianrules2

    Custodianrules2 Cohan + Rowell = Suck

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    11,741
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class="quote_poster">Quoting Warriorfansnc93:</div><div class="quote_post">New starting 5

    CardinalPF
    Claxton PG
    Cheaney SG
    Pietrus SF
    Jones C

    Oh yeah!</div>

    LOL! Numbers don't lie! Yeah it's pretty much safe to say that you need to look at that thing according to matchups and which players are out on the court at the same time. Like the 5 player rotations. Then I think it makes sense. I'm just joking around on Dunleavy on and cheering on Cardinal.
     

Share This Page