http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/analysis/anomalies.htmlAn interesting read, and please do not post your thoughts on the subject without first reading that page.
that is some scary stuffI would hope to god that our country wouldn't stoop to as low as what this website is indicating. But then again you never know....
I'm not leaning either way, because sites like this that just show everything from one perspective tend to bend the truth and omit critical facts, I'd really like to hear someone defend the U.S. on the matter and then I'll make up my mind.
It's all a bunch of garbage. 1. If 9/11 was a coverup it would involve hundreds of people. If this were true someone would spill the beans and bring this to light. No way could they keep a coverup this big secret and no way could that many people keep that inside them without feeling extreme guilt. 2. These people who think the goverment did it cannot make a formal story of the events. All they do is find a few random things and they don't tell you how everything happened. For example. They think a missile was used to hit the Pentagon They think bombs exploded the WTC's after the planes hit They think the goverment shot down the plane in Pennsylvania. For a terrorist attack this all makes little sense. Why would the WTC be hit by airplanes and the the Pentagon hit by a missile? Where did the U.S. Airlines plane have gone if it didn't hit the Pentagon? Why did hundreds of people report seeing a U.S. Airlines plane hit the Pentagon? 3. If bombs were used to bring down the WTC wouldn't the thousands of people that work in the WTC notice this? Wouldn't security notice this or figure it out? Their is no proof of any of this and these conspiracy people are out of their minds regarding 9/11. If anyone here wants to debate me on this bring it.
They didn't say that about the missile, it was just stated as a theory. They didn't say a plane didn't hit either, they just said that it would have been very difficult for someone to execute that manueveur. I personally don't agree with that part of the article either.I don't think that explosives were used in the destruction of either building, although what they say does make sense. The towers did follow the path of maximum resistance when they collapsed, but it was also the logical way for it to happen. If the buillding's frame was damaged where the plane impacted, then the section directly above the plane would fall directly down, it wouldn't go to the side if there was nothing to support it from below.I'm not saying that all of their points are valid, because some are illogical and far-fetched, but they do make some reasonable points. I also wasn't saying that I agree with this, I was simpy posting the page for discussion and presenting it as a possibility.
Well the war in Iraq was clearly only motivated by oil and money, but I don't know if Bush would go as far as to kill his own citizens.
Al-Qaeda has been trained by the CIA, they know what we do, they are not stupid. They know what they are doing. For coming here and not knowing the language very well they are effcient.
I didn't open the link, but if this is about the pentagon thing, where they say it's a rocket instead of a plane, it's <Censored>. They took the pics of the wreckage after it was cleaned up. My brothers friend went to DC and saw the plane wreckage there.
You can't tell these conspiracy people otherwise, they don't listen when people tell them they are wrong. When a plane hits the Pentagon at that speed and goes into the building their is not going to be much wreckage outside because of how fast it was going. Same reason wreckage didn't fly out of the WTC's when it crashed.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (nba dogmatist @ Mar 21 2006, 05:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I didn't open the link, but if this is about the pentagon thing, where they say it's a rocket instead of a plane, it's <Censored>. They took the pics of the wreckage after it was cleaned up. My brothers friend went to DC and saw the plane wreckage there.</div>I said don't post if you didn't read, because they didn't say that.
Alright...I found the movie...what a looney bunch. If you agree with these conspiracies post them here for debate.
^wait wat? u watched a 60 minute movie in 3 minutes?for anybody interested: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2...&q=loose+changenot saying I agree with what they're saying but it's something to think about....
