makes more sense in my view than kaplan or friedman did. i think maybe he sugar coats the domestic economic upheavals, and the potenial of an east bloc/russian consolidation/revival. kind of dismissive of a us political shifts' negative impacts too. shortterm many of his arguments make sense as far as likely fallout. a north america/south america hegemony would be a possibly more stable world order for the americas and be my best guess of 50 years hence if things play out as he predicts. maybe i should read something that he can defend more deeply to be completely sold. too bad i shot my wad for christmas this year.
Wow, he covered a lot of important topics with tons of meat to discuss. Has far as politics in America, I totally agree with him No matter how we got here, the power in politics is now controlled by the radical far left and the radical far right. That MUST change. We need more moderate representation. I do not care if it is a moderate Dem or moderate Rep machine that wins the next election. Or, as he hinted, an all new party that is moderate. We need to vote out both the radical right and the radical left.
last time i brought her up on the boards comments were"she's hot!", and the ilk. rumor was she was up for consideration in the trump administration, and she did't endorse hillary, in fact resigned from DNC committee position in protest of sanders treatment in primaries/debates. i think that was the short version anyway. may miss remember, oldtimers disease you know.
