Are the Steelers cheap?

Discussion in 'AFC North' started by cpawfan, Jul 30, 2007.

  1. cpawfan

    cpawfan Monsters do exist

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2007
    Messages:
    8,703
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    38
    http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburgh...s/s_519648.html</p>

    </p><p class="headline"><font size="4">Steelers haven't been stingy</font></p>

    </p> <span class="boldgrey"> By John Harris
    TRIBUNE-REVIEW
    </span> <span class="greytext">Monday, July 30, 2007</span>

    </p> When it comes to paying defensive players, the Steelers put their money where their mouth is.

    Since 2005, Steelers management has re-signed safety Troy Polamalu, defensive end Aaron Smith, cornerback Ike Taylor, nose tackle Casey Hampton and backup nose tackle Chris Hoke to contracts totaling $110 million with $39 million in bonus money. </p>

    If you include rookie linebackers Lawrence Timmons and LaMarr Woodley, the numbers jump to $128 million in contracts and $48.8 million in bonus money. </p>

    That's a lot of cash for an organization that has been stereotyped unfairly for pinching pennies. </p>"I think it gives clout to the cliche that defense wins championships, offense wins games," Polamalu said.

    Polamalu signed an extension worth $33 million on the first day of training camp. It's the largest contract in Steelers history. </p>

    Polamalu's deal topped the $24.5 million extension signed by Smith during the offseason. </p>

    Smith's deal topped the $23.75 million extension signed by Taylor last September. </p>

    Taylor's deal topped the $22.8 million extension signed by Hampton in 2005. </p>

    The contracts made Polamalu, Smith, Taylor and Hampton the highest paid at their positions in team history. </p>

    Hoke's extension is for $6 million and includes a $1.5 million bonus. </p>

    Timmons, the No. 15 pick in the draft, signed a five-year deal worth as much as $15 million with a little over $8 million in bonus money. </p>

    Woodley, the Steelers' second-round pick, will receive $1.8 million in bonus money. </p>

    With new coach Mike Tomlin's reputation as a defensive coach, Steelers management is banking on locking up key players on that side of the ball. </p>

    "We've had a good defense for a lot of years," Smith said. "They obviously made it the focus right now to get the defense signed and keep it intact." </p>

    The trend started with Hampton when management re-signed him following his fourth season, one year after appearing in his first Pro Bowl. </p>

    Next came Taylor, who had been in the league three years and had started only one season when he re-signed. </p>

    Taylor's deal was also unusual in NFL circles because it's rare for a player who started only one season to be paid among the elite at his position. </p>

    "The front office, they've been doing it for a while," said Taylor, a fourth-round draft pick in 2003. "They've got an eye for talent and character. There are a lot of young, hungry, talented guys on defense." </p>

    Polamalu, who was selected in the first round in 2003, received his new deal following three Pro Bowl seasons. </p>

    Smith was rewarded following his eighth season. </p>

    Of course, with the Steelers re-signing so many defensive players, it raises the question as to what side of the ball that management values more. </p>

    You don't have to be six-time Pro Bowl guard Alan Faneca to know the answer. </p>

    Faneca blew his stack at the team's May minicamp because he couldn't secure a new deal. </p>

    Maybe Faneca should play defense. </p>

    </p>
     
  2. TheBeef

    TheBeef Commish of FUN!

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2003
    Messages:
    5,495
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    38
    There was a time when it looked like the Steelers were cheap, especiially with defensive players, but that was more about the circumstances of the league than the money itself....in the late 90s and the early part of the decade, the Steelers kept letting ALL PRO LBs leave via free agency, and they kept replacing them with equally productive players late in the draft....so of course, to the casual fan, this give the effect that the Steelers are cheap and that they draft LBs better than anyone else....the real truth is that the Steelers were the only team running the 3-4 and because of this, they were targeting players that didnt fit into anyone elses defense....they were targeting smaller college defensive ends that are "tweeners" in a 4-3, but are big athletic LBs on the outside of a 3-4....other teams were passing on these players, because they couldnt use them....then after they go to Pitt and look dominating, teams sign them and they are free agent busts....the same thing was happening in Denver with RBs(Portis excluded) and O-lineman
     
  3. cpawfan

    cpawfan Monsters do exist

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2007
    Messages:
    8,703
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Yeah, the Steelers did a very good job of identifying when it was no longer worth it to pay their LB big money. Chad Brown was the only one that I was upset about, but it was understandable to see them let go of Greg Lloyd, Kevin Greene and Levon Kirkland
     

Share This Page