I agree with Canzano on this story. The Beavers coaching staff needs to be shuffled because its obvious the Beaver program has been losing its ground and Langsdorf needs some new assistants on their offense sceem of things. Source: http://www.oregonlive.com/sports/or...f/2011/11/canzano_mike_riley_needs_to_co.html
The "sceem" isn't the primary issue. Granted, some creativity would help, but just changing "sceem" when they haven't recruited on the OL and can't establish a run game isn't going to change anything. When a team doesn't have the talent to create plays, changing staff won't do a thing. OSU currently has three OL verbals, which look strong. But, for some unknown reason, in 2010 they recruited one OL and he was a 250 pounder. For years around 2010, the players the did recruit just didn't develop into strong players. OSU current sits second to last in the Pac in points scored and has one of the worst rushing games in the Pac. This puts pressure on Mannion and Mannion's arm might earn two or three games a year, but it's not enough to win vs any .500 team or better.
Targus that was really rude. He's a Beaver fan posting and commenting on an article about the Beavers. You need to be more considerate in the Beavers forum.
Ah, I see. So are you equally concerned and consistent when he initially responded: "Nice sarcasm Targus. Why waste a thread space when the Beavers are probably a 21 point underdog against Stanford? Beavers had no chance on this game. Thanks for your worthless post on info." When I voiced ONLY my support for the Beavs this Sat? Tell me what I said that he didn't, Sly? It's OK for him to start it, but not for me to reply and use the exact same words. Nice job, Sly. Don't call me out and lecture me, if you're not going to do the same with others. Had Natedogg been respectful, his post would have been treated respectfully. Odd how that works, yah? Sure, I'll be more considerate. You might consider doing the same - and being a bit more consistent. Regards
Figured and would have bet you wouldn't respond. No matter what I say and post on this board, I'll always explain, attempt to provide more details on my point or even apologize. Too bad others can't claim the same - and I've been asked by admin why the board isn't growing... LOL
I'm not sure what you want me to say? I thought your post was kind of rude. You then quoted me what I'm guessing is some post by Nate for some different thread as justification for your post. Honestly the whole thing isn't that big of a deal to me. I'm not a mod of this forum. When I post in here I'm just a regular member like you. I was just disappointed in your post because it pretty much killed all football talk in the thread and I'm in a mood for football today.
Really? That's why your tag says "Global Moderator" and you tell people how they need to post? Interesting.
Wrong. The best way to reheat a steak is to microwave it on low to medium power, covered, with a drizzle of oil (pref olive oil) and a splash of water. Most people are too lazy and just blindly throw the steak in the oven on high without a moisture source and allow the conduction to overheat, thus rupturing and firming the protein structure of the steak.
