Tonight's game turned into a slam dunk competition for the Bucks. It's nice to see them have fun when they can. Although the score looks okay, the Bucks basically dominated the game and it was all dunks and smiles. D Mase and Gadzuric's dunks were incredible.
Boxscore What was up with Michael Redd's game? Redd shot 4-12, had no assists, and only grabbed one rebound. This game proved to me that the Bucks can survive without Redd in the game at all times.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Wave:</div><div class="quote_post">Boxscore What was up with Michael Redd's game? Redd shot 4-12, had no assists, and only grabbed one rebound. This game proved to me that the Bucks can survive without Redd in the game at all times.</div> Wow, amazing how you can come to that conclusion after one game. It pains me me to see how you ignore how many times Redd has led that team to victories (22, 6 and 3 on the year) and pick on his one bad game to make a point without any real substance. Please, don't let your college preferences dictate how you judge a player. This is the big league now, and Redd is proving he's a bonafide star.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Sir Desmond:</div><div class="quote_post">Wow, amazing how you can come to that conclusion after one game. It pains me me to see how you ignore how many times Redd has led that team to victories (22, 6 and 3 on the year) and pick on his one bad game to make a point without any real substance. Please, don't let your college preferences dictate how you judge a player. This is the big league now, and Redd is proving he's a bonafide star.</div> Huh? When did I say anything against Redd, against his college career, or pick on his bad game? I asked what was up with him, and said this team proved they could win without him. I don't get where any of those comments came from.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Wave:</div><div class="quote_post">Huh? When did I say anything against Redd, against his college career, or pick on his bad game? I asked what was up with him, and said this team proved they could win without him. I don't get where any of those comments came from.</div> The Kings have won games without Webber, the Lakers have won games without Kobe, Shaq and Malone - does that prove to you that they can "can survive without then in the game at all times."? Maybe you meant it differently, but that reads as if you're directly slagging off Redd's value to the team. And I know you hate Ohio State
