Canzano can write and tell some good stories. But the misleading ones and manufactured drama he creates is far worse than the positives of what he tells. So I'm happy to pay no attention to him.
I think Quick is much better, more factual, and his opinions have more basis in logic and evidence. Biggest problem with his opinions, is they could be misinterpreted to be reporting of facts and events of the team. Still much better than Canzano or Jaynes, and I'd be fine if he took over any gaps left by those others.
Ben Golliver is pretty good, but for quite a while now he has reported on the whole NBA, not just the Blazers.
Also just seems like a brutal market for reporters, newspapers, writers, and media personalities. Unless you make it huge nationally as a Zach Lowe or Stephen A Smith I'm not sure these are super lucrative careers.
Do Quick, Canzano, or Jaynes even make six figures? Wouldn't be surprised if they were barely scraping by.