Chelsea's Spending Spree Over?

Discussion in 'England' started by b0o, Dec 17, 2006.

  1. b0o

    b0o DYC Squad Backup player

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2006
    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    It was reported in todays papers that UEFA are considering lodging action against Chelsea. It has been clamed that the clubs massive spending spree goes against the EU competition rules.

    If the complaint is upheld then it could result in Chelsea's spending being restricted to just what the club make in profits.

    I was wondering what your views were on this issue? Should Chelsea's spending be restricted? Does their spending go against the idea of "fair competition"? Or does their spending force other clubs to improve their performances and improve the overall quality of the league?
     
  2. dycdan

    dycdan DYC please wait...

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2006
    Messages:
    1,695
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">If the complaint is upheld then it could result in Chelsea's spending being restricted to just what the club make in profits.</div>So if Chelsea put a mascot of Stamford the Lion in the club shop and a rich nameless shopper buys him for 500mil then I guess they are round that one.

    Of course,what will it mean for clubs like ManU who can never make a profit until the debt is paid off and Arsenal too. It comes just as Liverpool are maybe getting more in than profits so it works for me.
     
  3. Spawny

    Spawny DYC 1st team Reserves

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2006
    Messages:
    230
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    I'd actually prefer it if they didn't have all this spending power. I prefered it back in the day when Chelsea were battling for Champions League spots, finishing 4th, 5th and 6th. It gave me a feeling that i just don't get no more, Chelsea aren't the team causing upsets anymore, they are the team being upset by smaller teams, which is what i miss i suppose.

    I do understand where the other fans and clubs are coming from. If it was another team who had all this spending power, I would be feeling pretty pissed off as well. It does ruin the league in the way that other teams can't compete with them sort of signings, but ... i think that other teams may need to up their game if this ban isn't imposed so it provides a more exciting performance week in, week out.
     
  4. Wolf

    Wolf Sig and Avatar made by me

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2006
    Messages:
    1,325
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    if they limited the spending then the premiership wouldn't have as many great players and wouldn't be as exciting.
     
  5. bbwMax

    bbwMax Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2006
    Messages:
    8,202
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    48
    it would be fairer for teams and managers such as bolton (big sam gets about a quid to spend and still does well) and portsmouth (redknapp buys old players but they sure play well for him e.g. campbell, kanu and james)
     

Share This Page