<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Respondents favored Clinton by greater than 2-to-1 margins when asked who did a better job at handling the economy (63 percent Clinton, 26 percent Bush) and solving the problems of ordinary Americans (62 percent Clinton, 25 percent Bush). (Watch whether Americans are getting nostalgic for the Clinton era -- 1:57)On foreign affairs, the margin was 56 percent to 32 percent in Clinton's favor; on taxes, it was 51 percent to 35 percent for Clinton; and on handling natural disasters, it was 51 percent to 30 percent, also favoring Clinton.Moreover, 59 percent said Bush has done more to divide the country, while only 27 percent said Clinton had.When asked which man was more honest as president, poll respondents were more evenly divided, with the numbers -- 46 percent Clinton to 41 percent Bush -- falling within the poll's margin of error. The same was true for a question on handling national security: 46 percent said Clinton performed better; 42 percent picked Bush.http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/12/bush.clinton.poll/</div>
Clinton also didn't make America even more hated around the World than they a;ready were. Infact Clinton was a fairly popular President Worldwide. Bush, unfortunately gives Americans a very bad image.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (kingjamez @ May 26 2006, 01:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>CNN = Communist News Network</div>Completely agree.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (kingjamez @ May 26 2006, 06:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>CNN = Communist News Network</div> When will Republicans figure out that CNN isn't your enemy and that all the major news networks are garbage.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (kingjamez @ May 26 2006, 10:49 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'> When will democrats stop blaming the republicans for everything bad that happens.</div>Well, considering that the Republicans control every branch of government...who should they blame?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (kingjamez @ May 29 2006, 01:09 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Whenever they do something wrong, they find some way blame it all on us.</div> Who cares? It happens both ways.
Yes, it happens to whomever is president. Whom shall they blame, since the republicans control everything?! I got a "news update" the other day on my phone that said something like, "Bush, Blair say Iraq was not as good as they hoped." It made me laugh.
Clinton easily outperformed Bush. Bush shows up to office, and before anything he's taking a vacation. Spending only 1/3 of his time in office in his first year. After september 11, that's when things start to get paniced, first Bush goes after Ossoma (of course), then after he's failed there he goes after Saddam... What did Saddam do? He had nucleur weapons, SO DOES THE US, why are we allowed to have nucleur weapons and no one else is. Anyways we attack their country and now we're still there with a MASSIVE defecit to pay up, leaving a trail for future presidents to be bothered by, oh and if this wasn't for the weapons what was it for? the oil? yes, except it's not goingt to the public is it, it's going to rich idiots who are giving Bush or should I say Cheyney's puppet more money. Bush sends hte National Gaurd to Iraq, they weren't supposed to be there... they were supposed to be in the U.S. for what? Oh i dunno, maybe A HURRICANE! Anyways it shows on how he dealt with katrina... Oh yeah, now recently with the immigration problems, the spanish make a translation for the National Anthem and he sais that this is dumb because immigrants should learn English?? And now with this border control, why are we keeping the illegal immigrants in the US but stopping all others. What did Clinton do? He lied about his personal buisness, AMERICA DOESN'T NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THAT...and guess what other than that he was an amazing president.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GArenas @ May 29 2006, 11:39 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>He had nucleur weapons, SO DOES THE US, why are we allowed to have nucleur weapons and no one else is.</div>I have heard this argument so many times, and the more I hear it, the less it makes sense to me. I don't think we have any "right" to it, but come on. What does Iraq have to protect in a nuclear invasion? Iran? Seriously. Why would the US attack someone with nuclear bombs in an offensive strike? I just can't foresee something like that happening. It might not be "right" or "fair," but I certainly would rather us have them than most other countries.
I would rather not, it is in the wrong hand siwth Bush! And this is not for us to decide, it's for the U.N. and guess what THEY DISAGREED WITH US! And no Waterr that is not why 9/11 happened, Al Queida was trying to create fear in the U.S. that is what terrorists do!
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GArenas @ May 29 2006, 03:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>And this is not for us to decide, it's for the U.N. and guess what THEY DISAGREED WITH US!</div>What are they going to do, send our own troops on us?
Wow you're basically ruining the image of the U.S. as you talk. The reason for the U.N. are these factors, if they want to go to war with someone, they work together not apart. Also, you didn't even try to reply to what I was saying you just threw out a dumb remark, which kind of proves that you don't actually care about how this world is run, you just care about the president...We signed that agreement for a reason with the U.N., if we continue acting like we runt he world, make no mistake the U.N. will turn against us...
