Whenever we put him in, he scores immediately. Maybe we should give him a shot in the rotation. I'd like to see what he could do with 15 minutes.
Don't play him another second and hope that some GM out there thinks that PER is a decent measure of a player's worth!
The PER means nothing yet, but I am very interested is seein more crabbe. I hope he gets a chance to show more. But what I like is his D looks really good for a young player. Add that to crazy good shooting from deep and that's a great piece.
Right now, our second best bench scorer, Blake, only averages 3.8 ppg I believe. Certainly, Crabbe could knock down two shots a game if given minutes.
The question isn't "will he score" to me. It's "will he be able to stop his man from scoring". Personally from the limited burn I've seen, he's looking pretty solid and active on the defensive end. I think he can hold his own
I always knew you were all about that Bass [video=youtube;iyTTX6Wlf1Y]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyTTX6Wlf1Y[/video]
Yeah tell me about it. It's weird because the year we grabbed Wright, many of us thought he was the perfect fit for our team. Including myself. It's a shame that wright hasn't done what we were hoping he would do
Update: Small Sample Size Alert (oopsie!) Crabbe's PER is now 9.7 - oh how the once mighty have fallen! Myers Leonard, with a PER = 27.7 is our new SSSS* (Small Sample Size Superstar)! BNM *Hey Denny and all site admins, why doesn't our version of vBulletin support the [sup]value[/sup] superscript formatting tag? The proper version of SSSS should be S[sup]4[/sup].
national debt is $18 x 10[sup]13[/sup] <--- superscript! I added subscript[sub]1[/sub] too. sup and sub tags. [sup]1[/sup]Thanks to BNM for pointing this out!
