CT School Shooting: For you conspiracy theorists...

This is interesting. The second-to-last paragraph, if true, is where it really gets interesting.

I do find it odd that one minute, the shooter's mom was shot at the school, and then later, she had nothing to do with the school. And there was a discussion of a second suspect, who was chased down, but then we've never heard anything further? I know there was mass chaos and panic, but there are a lot of things about this (as with some of the other shootings) that seem a bit odd to me.

There are additional links on the website at the bottom of her post that support the position below.


http://shortlittlerebel.wordpress.com/2012/12/16/urgent-update-on-connecticut-shooting/

Friends, there is a gift that God has given me: I can smell something fishy a mile away. Like Benghazi. Almost on day one, I told my husband: “The facts don’t make sense. Something is wrong here.” Last night, after I saw a talking head interview (or, I should say, NOT interview) the father of the boy who saw his teacher get shot and ran for his life with a couple of friends, I told my husband, “Something is not right here. She didn’t ask a single relevant question. So far, this boy is the only eye-witness of the gunman coming forward. She didn’t ask if the boy saw one or more shooters. She didn’t ask any details of what the gunman did first, second, third. She didn’t ask for a description of the gunman. These reporters are complete prostitutes. They could care less about the feelings of the people they interview. So why didn’t she ask any of these questions?” In fact, I could tell she was biting back questions. I looked at my husband and said, “Cal, this thing is starting to stink. By now, there should be many eye-witness accounts of the actual gunman. There should be breathless survivors talking about how this guy walked by their room, etc. About how they narrowly escaped. But so far, it looks like every single eye-witness is dead. That is IMPOSSIBLE!”

I watched the situation LIVE. There were original reports of a second man who was found in the woods that they had put in custody. This man was NEVER spoken of again. Why? The details of the shooting changed enormously from one minute to the next. Inside sources at the police departments were reporting one thing while the official accounts said completely different information. The news reports were full of such ambiguous NON statements that I was furiously looking throughout the internet to find solid evidence or eye-witness accounts to clarify. None was to be found. One example: They originally said that the shooter was buzzed in via the front office’s new video security system. Then, the news report said, “The shooter was NOT voluntarily buzzed into the school.” What the heck does THAT mean? Does that mean he forced his way through the system? Does that mean they have video evidence of his face? Does that mean that there was someone on the inside putting a gun to someone’s head to buzz the shooter in? Huh?

Also, it seems highly unlikely, based on descriptions of Adam, that he could have purchased all that black ops gear! The guy is described as being so shy that he would hug the school walls when someone approached him! Also, first the news definitely says the mother was a teacher and the classroom of dead kids was her class. Then, reports are that she had nothing to do with the school. So, why the shooting there? Also, the number and kind of weapons used changed. Also, where they discovered the weapons. Sometimes they reported that all the weapons were in the school. Then they said the rifle was in the car. But they also said that the shooter used the rifle to kill every single person with multiple shots.

No, something stinks here. The lack of eye witnesses of the shooter confirming the single shooter account is BLARINGLY absent. The reports of a second shooter in the woods has suddenly disappeared. The reporters are not grilling the one and only witness we know of- this little boy. Please don’t say they suddenly have even a smidge of conscience. The original statements about the shooter being buzzed into the school have simply disappeared. I was ready to let this go and explain it away as simple confusion. I was maddened by the timing and circumstances of the tragedy as concerns the upcoming UN small arms treaty & gun control. It killed me that this wack-job used LEGALLY REGISTERED weapons to do his killing. There is NO OTHER CONCLUSION, if the story is accurate, than the fact that had Adam Lanza NOT had access to those legal guns, he could never have killed those kids. He was too mentally ill to have gotten those weapons himself. He was diagnosed with Asperger’s Syndrome and we now know that he had many, many interventions by school officials in the past. I felt that the killing of little children would be the strongest argument yet that we should clamp down on gun ownership. I just couldn’t believe the TIMING and circumstances of this event- a GIFT to the Progressives to disarm us. Who can argue with this case? I was ready for the inevitable.

But a friend sent me the following links which tell a different story. Having reported the event LIVE and experienced the changing information, I am not surprised. In fact, it makes sense now.

Friends. I believe there is evidence of more than one shooter. I believe this was a PLANNED event- specifically to get the UN Small Arms Treaty signed. The father of the shooter is Peter Lanza, rumored to be scheduled to testify on the international LIBOR scandal. Guess who else is rumored to be scheduled to testify on the LIBOR scandal? Father of the BATMAN theater shooter. Amazing coincidence? We will see. The LIBOR scandal is a massive, worldwide network of banks, the Federal Reserve and highly position individuals such as Tim Geihtner and Ben Bernanke that are being accused of manipulating LIBOR rates to gain better market positions. Just some of the Banks involved are: the Canadian branches of the Royal Bank of Scotland, HSBC, Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan Bank, and Citibank, as well as ICAP (Intercapital), an interdealer broker.[37 It also mentions Bank of America & Barclays. It is ugly to its roots and VERY powerful people are involved.

I believe our GOVERNMENT shot those kids and teachers and used Adam Lanza and his family to pull it off. They might have killed two birds with one stone. One: If these men are involved in the LIBOR scandal, they can manipulate their testimony. Two: they get gun control. How very, very clever and efficient of them, right? I hate to say it. I hate to put myself ‘out there’ with this because I KNOW how I will be attacked. But I don’t do this for anyone’s approval. I do it to help the American People. You look at these links and you decide.

 

yeah..I have seen this and others like it, or close..

I know that when something like this happens it is natural to try and make sense of it, to find a meaning when at times there is not one to be had. It is like the brains ability to find patterns in the random.

I do believe that our government is corrupt, I do believe that oboma is very bad for this country, but I would have to have more than what I have seen to tie this into the gov..and that is where it would lie if the fed reserve and the NWO folks came into play..

 

Agreed. Not sure I believe it, but I don't totally dismiss it. The second-to-last paragraph, though, if true, really has to make one wonder.

 

Wow, you'd think someone who could gain so much insight into the government's secret plans from TV interviews would also be a threat to said government and they'd just take her out too.

 

Crackpot.

 

sly, I enjoy a good mocking as well as the next guy..and no, children have and recieve special treatment, even from the media. That said, you and I know that this child has been interviewed by the police already..in most cases, those findings would be made public, especialy in a case where the killer will not go to trial.

Where are those findings?
Where is the seconed shooter?
The guy that was detained, where is he? was mom an aid? did she have anyhing to do with the school as has been reported or not as has also been reported?
ya know, instead of beating us into tears with pictures of dead six year olds, how about some facts being cleared up,,or is this really an attempt to turn public opinion..., bah, oboma would never do that..

 

No ish.

 

Probably, but as one who believes that our government is super-corrupt and hides a lot of truths (and/or wildly twists them), it's just more fodder.

 

True, but this is a mass shooting of children. The police would aggressively follow up on any possible lead. I love a good conspirist theory as much as the next person, but this shooting should be off limits.

 

I believe that's law enforcement's and the media' fault in opening up conspiracy theories by not following up on some big pieces of the story that were originally reported, and then changed.

 

its pure conjecture, nothing more or less

but people get murdered for 50 bucks, if you are naive enough to swallow that they wouldnt get killed for 50 billion, i dont know what to say, huge corporations and banks have people killed all the time

 

Sums it up perfectly.

BTW, there was no "2nd gunman." The second person taken into custody was the shooter's brother. He was released because there was no evidence he had anything to do with it. If the author of the original story was really scouring the news/internet for info, she would have known that.

 

Believe me - I don't doubt it.

 

I specifically remember seeing reports/articles of people talking about a second gunman at the scene. There was some talk of chasing someone into woods or a field or something. The brother was nowhere near the scene, though he was originally ID'd as the shooter.

 

there were various reports of a man in camouflage pants being led away from the woods in handcuffs

i think thats where the hypothesizing started to work its way into a fevered frothing frenzy

 

Yeah, that's what I'm saying. You throw out these reports, and then don't follow up on them? That doesn't make sense, and I think people are struggling to believe their government, so they let these small occurrences grow into a full-on theory.

 

That's actually the same word I use for people with closed minds and who have more trust in the government than distrust.

That's not a knock on you by the way. I don't really buy into this lady's theory. I mean, there are some interesting pieces to all of this. And sometimes a lack of transparency causes the mind to explore. I'm not big into conspiracy theories as it is, but I think sometimes where there's smoke, there's fire (not necessarily with the CT shooting), and I do have a healthy fear/distrust of the government.