That kid is an offensive machine. The Memphis-Tennessee game should be very fun to watch..PFF, I've seen Rose highlights, and I've seen Gordon highlights, and without a doubt in my mind, I think Rose is better.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GrizzFanTaylor @ Jul 1 2007, 01:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>That kid is an offensive machine. The Memphis-Tennessee game should be very fun to watch..PFF, I've seen Rose highlights, and I've seen Gordon highlights, and without a doubt in my mind, I think Rose is better.</div>but every major recruiting site ranks Gordon aheadScout.comRivals.comBoth rank Gordon ahead of RoseAnd don't forget Gorden dropped 40 on ESPN2 with MJ in the house
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Pacers fan forever @ Jul 1 2007, 01:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>but every major recruiting site ranks Gordon aheadScout.comRivals.comBoth rank Gordon ahead of RoseAnd don't forget Gorden dropped 40 on ESPN2 with MJ in the house</div>Ok, that's their opinion. This is mine. Rose is more athletic, can shoot, and is a very good passer. I like Rose more. Anyway, weren't you the one that said Scout.com and Rival.com were stupid sites or something along those lines? Yes, I think you were.DraftExpress has Derrick Rose going 3rd in their 2008 mock draft, while Gordon is at 9.CollegeHoops has Rose as a 5 star and Gordon as a 4 star.Different sites, different ratings. All I'm saying is that IMO, Rose is better.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=zNQRKsZYXZ8http://youtube.com/watch?v=NKDoqI-CihM&...ted&search=http://youtube.com/watch?v=sL5Ur4m0hKMhttp://youtube.com/watch?v=MH2Cz7e3CWsPeep these videos and tell me how Eric Gordon does not look like the next big thing
I'm not saying Gordon isn't good, because he is. I just think Rose is better. He is more athetic and quicker than Gordon, is a good shooter, a good passer, and makes more impressive plays than Gordon.I'm almost 100% sure that if Rose was the one commited to Indiana and not Gordon, you'd be saying Rose was better.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GrizzFanTaylor @ Jul 1 2007, 02:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Ok, that's their opinion. This is mine. Rose is more athletic, can shoot, and is a very good passer. I like Rose more. Anyway, weren't you the one that said Scout.com and Rival.com were stupid sites or something along those lines? Yes, I think you were.DraftExpress has Derrick Rose going 3rd in their 2008 mock draft, while Gordon is at 9.CollegeHoops has Rose as a 5 star and Gordon as a 4 star.Different sites, different ratings. All I'm saying is that IMO, Rose is better.</div><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GrizzFanTaylor @ Jul 1 2007, 02:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I'm not saying Gordon isn't good, because he is. I just think Rose is better. He is more athetic and quicker than Gordon, is a good shooter, a good passer, and makes more impressive plays than Gordon.I'm almost 100% sure that if Rose was the one commited to Indiana and not Gordon, you'd be saying Rose was better.</div>This is what I'm saying: Rose is the better NBA prospect, no doubt. But as far as college ball goes: Gordon has the edge.
Derrick Rose is going to be a monster next season. What scouts say makes him so good is hes a pass first player. So basicly hes a true PG who is an excellent playmaker but his offensive game is good enough for start at SG and hes extremely athletic. They also say his work ethic in unquestionable. I think Gordon and Mayo are going to be very good and they all have their strengths, but most scouts agree that Rose seems to be the better prospect. Im really excited cause hes perfect for Memphis.
