Do you agree? Why or why not?

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by BrianFromWA, Dec 8, 2011.

  1. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,073
    Likes Received:
    9,027
    Trophy Points:
    113
    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2016965870_apusobamaforeignpolicy.html
    For the record, I think it was stupid for lower-tier candidates (like Santorum) to say that the President was "appeasing" terrorists. They should've attacked specific policies if they wanted to: bring up that you don't like how he's treated Israel or Hamas or Iran or whatever, but I saw this quote and wondered if I was missing something.
     
  2. DaLincolnJones

    DaLincolnJones Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2011
    Messages:
    8,319
    Likes Received:
    1,885
    Trophy Points:
    113
    yeah I agree, pretty weak.

    Just like Mit attacking obummer on religion...wft is he thinking...
     
  3. MARIS61

    MARIS61 Real American

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,007
    Likes Received:
    5,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired Yankee
    Location:
    Beautiful Central Oregon
    I try not to pat myself too much on the back, but this administration has done more in terms of the security of the state of Israel than any previous administration,"

    I'd say that's an accurate statement, or as Rooster Cogburn would say "No brag, just fact".

    That said, he's President of The US, not Israel.

    When he can truthfully say this administration has done more for the Freedom and Civil Rights for all Americans than any previous administration, then I'll listen.
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2011

Share This Page