Does VC + Losses = Turmoil?

Discussion in 'Brooklyn Nets' started by NJNetz, Sep 13, 2008.

  1. NJNetz

    NJNetz BBW Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2004
    Messages:
    14,413
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Source
     
  2. MisterMontross

    MisterMontross Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2008
    Messages:
    388
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I don't believe he is correct.
     
  3. cpawfan

    cpawfan Monsters do exist

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2007
    Messages:
    8,703
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I highly doubt it. This is a no pressure which is perfect for Vince
     
  4. Real

    Real Dumb and Dumbest

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2007
    Messages:
    2,858
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I think one of the big differences with what happened with Vince and the Raptors in 04 and Vince and the Nets in 08 is that there was the perception, at least on Vince's part, that management wasn't doing much or anything to win, that there was no light at the end of the tunnel.

    That's not really the case here. Even though this season and probably next will be tough, the team is stockpiled with young talent, and no matter what you think of the rumors about 2010, it's provided some source of hope.
     
  5. cpawfan

    cpawfan Monsters do exist

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2007
    Messages:
    8,703
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    38
    No, the difference is the Toronto fans expected Vince to save them and lead them.

    In NJ, Vince just has to play
     
  6. MisterMontross

    MisterMontross Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2008
    Messages:
    388
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    No, the difference is that Sam Mitchell felt that Vince wasn't a player that cared, Sam knew that Bosh was the player Raptors should build around and count on, and was benching VC at the end of games.

    Nets are making Vince the leader of their team that not much is expected of, which is VC's meat.
     
  7. MaxaMillion711

    MaxaMillion711 ...?

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2004
    Messages:
    814
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Occupation:
    Mixer
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    i feel that if people really believe this, they did not watch vince last year.

    he had every opportunity to vent his disgust and he did not. he could have demanded a trade, but he did not. he could have sat out the rest of the year with an injury, but he did not. he kept expressing that he wants to be here BECAUSE he continually says that "they picked me up when i was wounded" and he is forever grateful for that.

    i think vince has matured lightyears ahead of what he was back in TO in 2004. Even if the team is a 34 win team (which they probably will be) I expect vince to stay positive and motivate the team.
     
  8. Dumpy

    Dumpy Yi-ha!!

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2007
    Messages:
    4,231
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I don't know why people insist on believing that Vince is the same person as he was four or five years ago. That's like saying that John McCain was the same! :lol:
     
  9. MisterMontross

    MisterMontross Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2008
    Messages:
    388
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    And you think McCain is not the same?
     
  10. GMJ

    GMJ Suspended

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,067
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    0
    He's not the Maverick he once was. He's "sold out" so to speak, and embraced catering to the whim of the Republican party in his attempt to become president.

    There are many others on this forum that can speak on this issue better than me, though.
     
  11. MisterMontross

    MisterMontross Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2008
    Messages:
    388
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Oh, he's the same, just learned how to present his bullcrap a little better.

    He now has the entire Republican machine behind him now. Rove and crew. Here comes change. LOL!!!!
     
  12. Dumpy

    Dumpy Yi-ha!!

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2007
    Messages:
    4,231
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    eight years ago he ripped the religious right during his campaign. Now he is catering to them. Regardless, the point was just that people change over time. Maybe Vince was totally at fault five years ago in Toronto. Maybe he was a whining baby who demanded a trade, I really don't know. I do know, though, that as a Net he has never complained about anything, and rarely missed a game for any reason. he has also put up consistently tremendous stats. There are still reasons to be annoyed with him, but I am willing to believe that his somewhat erratic play last year was due to his injury. I am also willing to believe that his sometimes poor play in the playoffs has been in part due to the lack of ability of his teammates. I am also willing to believe that he will not be a cancer or demand a trade until proven wrong.

    The only reason to be frustrated with him is that he doesn't have a super-killer instinct, but really how many people in the world do? he strikes me as just a normal, well-adjusted, introspective guy who happens to be a world-class athlete. He makes a great second banana, but unfortunately Kidd checked out early mentally. Kidd, I should point out, took far more games "off" over the past two years than Vince has. It just killed me when the Nets would get crushed and Kidd would just say "it just wasn't our night" or something like that. Kidd is the reason why their play was erratic--and the reason why the Mavericks' play was erratic once he arrived. He needs to look in the mirror. Vince will play better without Kidd than with him--you will see.
     
  13. MisterMontross

    MisterMontross Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2008
    Messages:
    388
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Politicians change what they say, not what they are.

    And they 'are' whatever benefits them most, personally.
     
  14. Dumpy

    Dumpy Yi-ha!!

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2007
    Messages:
    4,231
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    to a great extent that is true, but now he is willing to pander to the right, and that will be crystallized when he makes his appointments for the heads of each government department and agency, who hold tremendous power.
     
  15. MisterMontross

    MisterMontross Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2008
    Messages:
    388
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Pandering for his own benefit.
     
  16. Dumpy

    Dumpy Yi-ha!!

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2007
    Messages:
    4,231
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    you're getting off-track. This is about Vince, and the ability of people to change their preferences, priorities, and even the way they react to certain situations and stimuli. I refuse to hold it against him what he may have said and did five years ago, just like I am not going to bitch about the Nets giving certain players a "fresh start" in their "fallen angels" program. Vince is who he is, and that is a damn fine player who happens to be a good guy. This year, at least on paper, he will be surrounded by the best (complete) set of teammates since becoming a Net. Maybe they don't have a big three anymore--but there will always be more better shooters on the floor with Vince, which should affect his play and the way he is defended. I, for one, am curious to see how it shakes out.
     
  17. MisterMontross

    MisterMontross Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2008
    Messages:
    388
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Best set of teammates? Really?

    If you mean in the sense that this is now Vince's kind of team, then I agree.
     
  18. Dumpy

    Dumpy Yi-ha!!

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2007
    Messages:
    4,231
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    No, I mean in the sense of #5-#14 on the roster, as a whole, is superior than the #5-#14 slots in any other year.

    edit: let's make that #5-#13. Swift and Ager are garbage. I am putting Hassell as #13 on the depth chart, and he is at least as good as players who started the season inactive in the past, like Hassan Adams for instance.
     
  19. MisterMontross

    MisterMontross Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2008
    Messages:
    388
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    You're talking about a team with 3 rookies, 5 players who's were no longer wanred by the team they played for last year, Stromile Swift, Trenton Hassell & Maurice Ager. And SWat hasn't proven he's a player.

    That's #4-#15.
     
  20. Dumpy

    Dumpy Yi-ha!!

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2007
    Messages:
    4,231
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    yes, I am. But I agree about Ager and Swift--see my edit above.
     

Share This Page