Expansion vs. Contraction

Discussion in 'NBA General' started by Shapecity, Feb 2, 2003.

  1. Shapecity

    Shapecity S2/JBB Teamster Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2003
    Messages:
    45,018
    Likes Received:
    57
    Trophy Points:
    48
    The NBA will be adding more franchises in the next few years, but I think the NBA needs to consider contracting instead. There are too many scrubs in the league and the quality of the game seems to be falling off. I think they need to get rid of about 4 teams. Players like Gerald Wallace, Hedo, Zach Randolph, and a lot of other guys should be starters on teams instead of rotting on the bench. I think the entire Kings bench is better than the entire Nuggets team. There's no reason a lot guys on Cleveland, Denver, Miami, and Memphis should even be in the league. Adding more teams is just going to open up 12 more spots for scrub players to make it on someone's team.

    The NBA already has the NBDL so why not make that league stronger by contracting instead of expanding.

    What do you guys think?
     
  2. aTTiCuS

    aTTiCuS JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2003
    Messages:
    124
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    i think they need to expand to just 30. Charlotte gettin another team is just gay. the wnba has already fallen off.
     

Share This Page