Gag Order Issued!

Discussion in 'NBA General' started by Mamba, Jul 25, 2003.

  1. Mamba

    Mamba The King is Back Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2003
    Messages:
    42,357
    Likes Received:
    502
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Temecula
    gag order issued

    Thursday, July 24
    Updated: July 25, 11:23 AM ET

    Gag order comes after police report made public

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Associated Press


    EAGLE, Colo. -- A judge, seeking to quell rumors and reports that could affect a trial in the Kobe Bryant case, Thursday issued a gag order on attorneys, witnesses and others involved in the case.

    The move came after scrutiny of Bryant's accuser intensified after police said she was hospitalized as a "danger to herself'' four months before the alleged sexual assault.

    University of Northern Colorado police chief Terry Urista said campus police received a call about 9 p.m. on Feb. 25 regarding a woman in a dormitory room.


    "An officer determined she was a danger to herself,'' he said. "It's classified as a mental health issue.''


    The woman was transported by ambulance to North Colorado Medical Center of Greeley, Urista said. He refused to say whether it was a suicide attempt.



    Prosecutors and an attorney for Bryant's 19-year-old accuser have declined to discuss details of the case or the background of the woman. Records relating to the case were sealed.


    Robert Pugsley, a criminal law professor at Southwestern University in Los Angeles, said if the two incidents turn out to be suicide attempts it could weaken the prosecution's case.


    "The more these indications of instability emerge, the more difficult it might prove for the prosecutor to persuade the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that this young woman did not misinterpret the event,'' he said.


    Another legal expert said the suicide attempt claims may never be heard at trial.


    Christopher Mueller, a law professor at the University of Colorado in Boulder, said judges can exclude evidence that exposes a witness to undue embarrassment if it isn't essential to the charges.


    "When there is no connection proven, that argument becomes pretty difficult,'' he said. "A court may very well bar it.''


    Mueller also said the defense will think "long and hard'' about whether to label Bryant's accuser unstable and suicidal. "To attack a person who comes into a court as a victim is always a tricky thing,'' he said.


    Bryant was charged with felony sexual assault after his accuser told authorities he attacked her at an Edwards resort June 30. Bryant said the sex was consensual.


    Meanwhile, Eagle County Judge Fred Gannett issued an order limiting public comment about the case by attorneys, authorities and others involved in the case, including Bryant and any witnesses.


    Citing concern about pretrial news coverage, the judge said it was his duty to try to guarantee a fair trial.


    "Where the case is a notorious one, that burden on the court is heavy,'' Gannett wrote.


    Before the judge's ruling, Eagle County Sheriff Joe Hoy dismissed speculation by at least one of the woman's friends that she is having second thoughts about going forward with the case.


    "As far as I've heard, that is just plain rumor,'' Hoy said. "That is just off-board.''


    Prosecutors met with the woman at length at her lawyer's office this week and interviewed other young women at the district attorney's office in Eagle. Friends say the woman is strong enough to withstand the media attention.


    Krista Flannigan, a spokeswoman for District Attorney Mark Hurlbert, said the final decision about pursuing the case rests with prosecutors, who represent the public and not just the victim.


    "It's not her complaint against him. It's the people of Colorado against him,'' she said.


    Prosecutors have sometimes decided to continue cases, including sexual assault and domestic violence ones, without the cooperation of victims, she said.


    Hoy, who was accused by defense attorneys of rushing the case against Hurlbert's wishes, also said it was up to the prosecutor whether to go to trial.


    "It wouldn't be her choice,'' Hoy said.
     
  2. Hunter

    Hunter Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2003
    Messages:
    9,560
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Im not surprised by the gag order at all. The judge has done this so that hopefully this case wont be a trial in the news but that is what is going to happen anyway. Im surprised the gag order didnt come sooner.
     
  3. Sasha

    Sasha ...since the beginning.

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2003
    Messages:
    3,950
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    The gag isn't going to help in any way, the media will still get access to whatever's going on. There was a gag order last year for Iverson, but everyone knew what was going on; CNN, ABC, NBC, newspapers, anyone.

    <font color="darkred">TheLakerShow834, please provide a link for this article to insure that proper credit is given to the source, and also please shorten it to a small excert and we can then click the link, to read the rest of the article. Thanks. </font>
     
  4. purehoops

    purehoops JBB KGSource

    Joined:
    May 29, 2003
    Messages:
    3,299
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    ^ this coming for the kid who posts peoples comics on the site... funny stuff
     

Share This Page