The New York Jets have declared OT Adrian Jones, FB B.J. Askew, DL C.J. Mosley, LB Cody Spencer, DL Dave Ball, RB Derrick Blaylock, QB Kellen Clemens inactive for Week 12. Sweet! Anthony Schlegel is active!Crap. Kellen Clemens isnt until the 4th Quarter.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (AdropOFvenom @ Nov 26 2006, 10:50 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>The New York Jets have declared OT Adrian Jones, FB B.J. Askew, DL C.J. Mosley, LB Cody Spencer, DL Dave Ball, RB Derrick Blaylock, QB Kellen Clemens inactive for Week 12. Sweet! Anthony Schlegel is active!Crap. Kellen Clemens isnt until the 4th Quarter. </div>Awww, they benched your boy Adrian Jones... how sad for you.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (AdropOFvenom @ Nov 26 2006, 10:50 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Crap. Kellen Clemens isnt until the 4th Quarter. </div>You might get your wish. Penny is hurt. I hope he's ok though....
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jon_Vilma @ Nov 26 2006, 01:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Sweet.But it's going to suck when the Jets finish out 10-6 and miss the playoffs. </div>If they Jets finish out 10-6, they likely will make the playoffs. I don't see there being more then 6 teams in the AFC with 10 wins for a tiebreaker scenario to even applyKC (7-4)- Tougher Schedule (Baltimore, @ San Diego, Jacksonville) + Herm-esque tradition of flopping out at the end of the season. Den (7-4) - Tougher Schedule (Seattle, @ San Diego, Cincinnati) + Rookie QB.Jac (6-5) - Tougher Schedule (@ Miami, Indianapolis, New England, @ Kansas City)Cin (6-5) - Tougher Schedule (Baltimore, @ Indy, @ Denver, Pittsburgh)One of Kansas City and Denver will probably manage to win 10 Games, but I can't see both of them doing it, and Jacksonville and Cincinnati are in a rediculously hard spot because of their upcoming schedules and the fact that they would have to win 4 out of 5 just to get to 10 wins against that schedule.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jon_Vilma @ Nov 26 2006, 01:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Sweet.But it's going to suck when the Jets finish out 10-6 and miss the playoffs. </div>Pennington seemed to be fine, he claimed he just got the wind knocked outta him. He played well today (but then again, this is the same Defense that J.P. Losman torched for 340 yards just one week ago.....) which is a good thing if we are to have any chance at making the playoffs....it seems everytime i go and call out Pennington he has a huge game, I should always be this tough on him. :whistling:
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (AdropOFvenom @ Nov 26 2006, 03:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jon_Vilma @ Nov 26 2006, 01:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Sweet.But it's going to suck when the Jets finish out 10-6 and miss the playoffs. </div>If they Jets finish out 10-6, they likely will make the playoffs. I don't see there being more then 6 teams in the AFC with 10 wins for a tiebreaker scenario to even applyKC (7-4)- Tougher Schedule (Baltimore, @ San Diego, Jacksonville) + Herm-esque tradition of flopping out at the end of the season. Den (7-4) - Tougher Schedule (Seattle, @ San Diego, Cincinnati) + Rookie QB.Jac (6-5) - Tougher Schedule (@ Miami, Indianapolis, New England, @ Kansas City)Cin (6-5) - Tougher Schedule (Baltimore, @ Indy, @ Denver, Pittsburgh)One of Kansas City and Denver will probably manage to win 10 Games, but I can't see both of them doing it, and Jacksonville and Cincinnati are in a rediculously hard spot because of their upcoming schedules and the fact that they would have to win 4 out of 5 just to get to 10 wins against that schedule.</div><u>Kansas City:</u>at Cleveland WBaltimore Lat San Diego Lat Oakland WJacksonville W<u>Denver:</u>Seattle Wat San Diego Lat Arizona WCincinnati LSan Francisco WI see them both going 11-5, the Jets going 10-6 and missing out.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jon_Vilma @ Nov 26 2006, 09:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><u>Kansas City:</u>at Cleveland W 8-4 (4-4)Baltimore L 8-5 (4-5)at San Diego L 8-6 (4-6)at Oakland W 9-6 (5-6)Jacksonville W 10-6 (6-6)<u>Denver:</u>Seattle W 8-4 (7-3)at San Diego L 8-5 (7-4)at Arizona W 9-5 (7-4)Cincinnati L 9-6 (7-5)San Francisco W 10-6 (7-5)I see them both going 11-5, the Jets going 10-6 and missing out.</div>That's nice, but your scenario only gives them 10 wins and Kansas City would lose the tiebreaker to the Jets with 6 Conference Losses and Denver might lose the tiebreaker also, depending on which of the remaining games the Jets lost.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (AdropOFvenom @ Nov 26 2006, 10:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jon_Vilma @ Nov 26 2006, 09:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><u>Kansas City:</u>at Cleveland WBaltimore Lat San Diego Lat Oakland WJacksonville W<u>Denver:</u>Seattle Wat San Diego Lat Arizona WCincinnati LSan Francisco WI see them both going 11-5, the Jets going 10-6 and missing out.</div>That's nice, but your scenario only gives them 10 wins and Kansas City would lose the tiebreaker to the Jets with 6 Conference Losses.</div>Oh, I miss counted then. My B. OK, in that case I see those 3 being 10 win teams. If the Jets beat KC in a tie breaker then yes, I do indeed see us in the playoffs. Sucks for KC though, to go 10-6 2 years in a row and miss the playoffs 2 years in a row....
