Ime Udoka anyone?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Tyler_Hansbrough, Jul 21, 2009.

  1. Tyler_Hansbrough

    Tyler_Hansbrough Auto-tune the News!

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2009
    Messages:
    593
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Been hearing a little of this. Would you want to bring him back for cheap, if all else fails?

    I think I would be okay with that. He wouldn't be long term. Gives us a veteran and someone who plays perimeter D well and can hit the corner 3.
     
  2. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    57,713
    Likes Received:
    56,216
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    I don't want to compromise Nic's development for Ime.
     
  3. mook

    mook The 2018-19 season was the best I've seen

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    8,309
    Likes Received:
    3,944
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Buy a recipe binder at CookbookPeople.com
    Location:
    Jolly Olde England
    I could live with him filling in for spot minutes as backup SF. At some point this season Roy, Rudy and/or Batum are going to miss some games. Ime is the kind of guy you can bury in your roster in case of that eventuality. And if you don't need him, you probably won't hear him complain.

    He makes more sense to me than trying to add Pendegraph/Cunningham/Freeland all to man the backup power forward spot.
     
  4. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,783
    Likes Received:
    27,541
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So that would give us

    Batum, Outlaw, Webster, Roy, Fernandez, Cunningham and Udoka at the 3?


    Shit yes we shoul dget him. He is the missing piece. :smack:
     
  5. Tyler_Hansbrough

    Tyler_Hansbrough Auto-tune the News!

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2009
    Messages:
    593
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Wow, I didn't know Roy, Rudy and Outlaw played 3. I was pretty sure Outlaw was penciled in for backup 4, Roy was our starting 2 and Rudy was our backup 2. But hey, I could be wrong.
     
  6. Foulzilla

    Foulzilla No Blood, No Foul.

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    305
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    18
    While Rudy doesn't play much 3, Roy and Outlaw both spent a fair amount of time at the 3 last season. No reason to believe they won't again. I really don't think we need to add Udoka, but if Pritchard hasn't added anyone by the time the season rolls around, Ime would be a solid guy to stick at the end of the bench in case of injuries.
     
  7. mook

    mook The 2018-19 season was the best I've seen

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    8,309
    Likes Received:
    3,944
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Buy a recipe binder at CookbookPeople.com
    Location:
    Jolly Olde England
    Batum continues to start. Outlaw is probably going to be traded (we have Rudy to play the "instant offense" role). Webster may never play again, and even if he does, it's not like he was that great when he was healthy. Cunningham? Do you really want him to be our starting small forward if Batum has an injury?

    Yep. Because every small roster change now will be the missing piece that tips us from first round losers to NBA champion.
     
  8. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,783
    Likes Received:
    27,541
    Trophy Points:
    113
    According to 82games.com

    Of the 5 man rotations, and a total of 2567 minutes, either Roy, Fernandez or Outlaw played a total of 1523 minutes at the 3. That is 59% of the time.
     
  9. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,783
    Likes Received:
    27,541
    Trophy Points:
    113



    Whay is Outlaw "probably going to be traded"? There was a contingent deal supposedly with Memphis that would have sent Travis there for a pick had we got Millsap, but we didn't. If Portland still doesn't want to do that then what in the hell do they plan on trading him for?


    Adding Udoka would be silly.
     
  10. oldmangrouch

    oldmangrouch persona non grata

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    12,403
    Likes Received:
    6,325
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Let's see: 2 actual SFs (Batum and Udoka); 2 SGs; 1 PF/SF tweener; 1 undersized, rookie PF; and a 1 guy with 1 leg.

    Of that list, Udoka is hardly the worst option as a back-up to Batum.
     
  11. Sheldon Shape

    Sheldon Shape Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    Messages:
    7,596
    Likes Received:
    6,474
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This is starting to get depressing. No Sessions or Miller, so we should go get Ime Udoka. I was 100% in the KP camp but this summer has blown on epic proportions. It's not his fault that Hedo left or Paul left, but the dude needs to get to doing something.
     
  12. Tyler_Hansbrough

    Tyler_Hansbrough Auto-tune the News!

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2009
    Messages:
    593
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    KP has not blown anything until the trade deadline expires.
     
  13. LameR

    LameR Ha Seung-Jin Approved!

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2005
    Messages:
    2,175
    Likes Received:
    137
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Soccer Coach
    Location:
    Cincinnati
    Are these guys all SFs that would play?

    Batum? Yup.

    Outlaw? Gone hopefully.

    Webster? Yup...if healthy. Pretty big if.

    Roy and Fernandez? They could play there, but are more of SGs, and may be paired in the backcourt at times.

    Cunningham? Won't play a ton of minutes most likely.

    Under my assumptions, you have Roy and Fernandez at SG, Batum and Webster at SF, with Cunningham getting spot minutes. If any of those guys get hurt, I would like to have a player like Udoka to fill in. I don't want him to be playing 20 mpg, but he's someone I would be comfortable having a backup for SG/SF.
     
  14. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,783
    Likes Received:
    27,541
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Roy and Fernandez DID play there a lot though. There is no reason to think that will change. Batum SHOULD also get a lot more minutes. Adding Udoka would be stupid.
     
  15. LameR

    LameR Ha Seung-Jin Approved!

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2005
    Messages:
    2,175
    Likes Received:
    137
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Soccer Coach
    Location:
    Cincinnati
    So say Outlaw gets traded. That's something I'm assuming will happen this summer. That leaves us with Roy/Rudy/Batum/Cunningham at the moment. You're comfortable with going into the season like that? If one of them gets hurt we're in trouble.
     
  16. alex42083

    alex42083 Thanks Brandon

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    7,789
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    Writing about sports
    Location:
    Canby, Wilsonville, Portland
    No thanks to Ime, unless he'd be willing to be that 12th man and be used in emergency situations. I don't see the Blazers being interested.
     
  17. Foulzilla

    Foulzilla No Blood, No Foul.

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    305
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Roy did. Fernandez didn't. According to 82games.com, Rudy spent 0% of the teams total minutes at the SF position (which means he did spend some time, but so little that it rounded down to 0). Roy on the other hand played 25% of the teams total minutes at the SF spot.


    Just wanted to back up what I said regarding this earlier. Outlaw used 37% of the teams total time at the 3. That's the most of anyone on the team (Batum was 35%). So yes, Roy and Outlaw ate up the vast majority of the 3 minutes last year. I can only imagine this will increase as Rudy will be able to play more minutes, and believe it or not Roy had a better PER as a 3 than a 2 (though both were excellent).
     
  18. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I guess it all depends on what kind of contract Ime is looking for and what Martell's status is for the coming year. If Martell isn't able to come back we'd technically have a single true small forward in Nic, with Brandon able to play there some, Travis being better at the 4, and Cunningham a tweener who is going to have trouble guarding 3s. At least Ime can give you some defense on the wing but he was a lousy 3 point shooter last season and his efficiency on the floor was Jerryd Bayless poor. I guess I'd offer him the veteran's minimum. :dunno:

    :sigh:
     
    Last edited: Jul 21, 2009
  19. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,783
    Likes Received:
    27,541
    Trophy Points:
    113


    While Outlaw should get traded, why is everyone so sure he will get traded?
     
  20. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,701
    Likes Received:
    2,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Why bother? Ime is 32 in two weeks or so and, as MM points out, we have six swing men already. If we really need a seventh swing man due to injury, etc., then our season will have been a disaster and we might as well have a younger guy at the end of the bench.

    Ed O.
     

Share This Page